Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Long-Term Nicotine Patch Use Improves Quit Rate, But Effects Don't Last
February 5, 2010

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Smokers who wore nicotine patches for six months were twice as likely to quit as those who unknowingly received placebos after wearing real patches for two months, according to a new study.

However, smoking rates were the same among both groups a year after the study began, Reuters reported Feb. 1.

Study author Caryn Lerman of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and colleagues found that the outcomes for long-term patch use with similar to those found among patients taking the medications Chantix or Zyban. Lerman said the findings suggest that "we may need to reconsider our guidelines about the length of treatment and consider, at least for some smokers, longer-term therapy."

The study tracked 568 daily smokers. It was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by John French on 08 Feb 10 10:28 AM EST
We could keep them on the patch indefinitely, and call it "nicotine maintenance." There is more than enough justification to claim the same kinds of potential benefits as methadone or suboxone for heroin addicts.

Posted by David Turner on 08 Feb 10 10:28 AM EST
This study simply confirms what other studies of the [in]efficacy of a drug approach to drug use seems to prove, that anti-drug drugs do not affect thought processes and behavior established over years of self-abusive behavior. Not only is the use of drugs ineffective over the long haul, it promotes the notion of addict powerlessness, dependence on outside forces, be they medical or other, to provide a cure. Smoking cigarettes or marijuana or cocaine is ALWAYS a choice, and the cure for making a self-abusive choice is not outside intervention but the counter choice, to choose not to engage in self-abuse. Providing drugs to “cure” the addict only serves to validate drug use, an already established belief by the “addict” to deal with everyday fears and frustrations. I am not advocating the use of a strictly behavioral approach as superior to a pharmacologic one. Both aim to extinguish a targeted behavior. To be effective “treatment” must aim at the total self abuser, must encourage the “addict” to appreciate his/her adequacy in controlling the urge to use, to self-destruct. The battle line is the impulse, and acting on the impulse is always a choice.

Posted by Diane on 08 Feb 10 04:32 PM EST
I think I read that the abstinence rates for long-term nicotine replacement users and placebo users were "the same a year after the study began". If so, how does this justify their conclusion that longer-term tx is necessary for some smokers? They then say that the success rate for patch users was the same as Chantix users. Again, why the longer term of tx if 2 month's of nicotine replacement tx gets the same results? Furthermore, as Mr. Turner points out, no pharmacological tx will be successful if you don't also address the behavioral components of substance abuse. You have to replace the addictive behavior with something else or people will just fall back into old habits.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments