Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Treatment Referrals Most Likely to Come from Criminal-Justice System
October 18, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

The criminal-justice system accounts for more than one in three referrals to addiction-treatment programs nationally, and such referrals are more likely to result in completed treatment stays, according to the latest Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) report from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

A total of 1.8 million Americans were admitted to treatment programs in 2007, according to the TEDS report, and of these 671,000 (37 percent) were referred by the criminal-justice system. Researchers found that 22 percent of criminal-justice referred patients dropped out of treatment, compared to 27 percent of overall treatment patients.

Criminal-justice referrals of adolescents (under age 18) have increased from 38 percent of all admissions in 1992 to 47 percent in 2007, the TEDS data showed. Alcohol, opiates, marijuana, cocaine and methamphetamine accounted for 96 percent of all treatment admissions, with the high rate of juveline referrals from the criminal-justice system perhaps explaining the high prevalance of admissions with marijuana cited as the primary drug of abuse, researchers said.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bill Godshall on 19 Oct 09 10:51 AM EDT
Nothing like giving those caught with marijuana (which is far less hazardous than cigarettes or excessive drinking) a choice between jail and a drug treatment program. This absurd public policy wastes taxpayers dollars, costs marijuana law violators money, jobs and respect, while only benefitting owners and operators of drug treatment programs. While this type of policy may benefit society and repeat DUI offenders and others who repeatedly commit crimes while drunk, on meth or crack, it makes no more sense to apply this policy to marijuana users than it does to moderate drinkers or cigarette or other tobacco users.

Posted by Brian McDonough on 23 Oct 09 10:00 AM EDT
I would like to ask Mr. Bill G. where he gets his facts. It has been proven marijuana is a 'steppingstone'to 'harder drugs & his more hazardous than cigarettes. Excessive drinking? Get real Bill, & put down the joint.Treatment works! I've seen it first hand.Education is the first line of defense. Treatment for adolescents can only be benificial. Jail isn't.

Posted by Lucy Spencer on 26 Oct 09 01:02 AM EDT
Of course education is critical. Marijuana is not for kids, and nobody should be learning about cigs, booze, or joints only from their friends. Treatment can be a good option, when there are other coexisting issues complicating the issue. But the only reason that marijuana is a stepping stone is because people who have to live under the radar know each other and socialize. It has nothing to do with the nature of the plant itself. Also, studies have been done to "prove" that marijuana is not any more hazardous than cigarettes. Proving something in a study often depends on who is paying for the research when it comes to this sort of thing. Just because marijuana has no benefit to you doesn't mean it has no benefit to others. Think outside the box. One size does not fit all.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines