Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Study Says Confrontational Stop-Smoking Counseling Ineffective
January 22, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

A new study suggests that smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease react poorly to confrontational therapy aimed at getting them to quit smoking.

A frank discussion of a smoker's 'lung age,' based on a demonstration of spirometry data, had been considered a possible method to motivate patients to accept the need to stop smoking, but the new data suggest otherwise.

"Confrontational counseling may have short-term effects, but these diminish during the first year after initial counseling treatment," said lead study author Daniel Kotz of the Maastricht University Medical Center in the Netherlands.

In this study, patients were assigned to receive confrontational counseling by a nurse with nortriptyline for smoking cessation, regular counseling by a nurse with nortriptyline, or "care as usual" for smoking cessation by their family physician. Only the first group was confronted with their abnormal spirometry results.

No difference in cotinine-validated prolonged abstinence was found between the experimental group (11.2 percent) and the group receiving regular counseling (11.6 percent) from week 5 through week 52 of the study.

"The high failure rates dramatically emphasize the difficulty tobacco-addicted smokers experience with quitting smoking and highlight the need for treating tobacco addiction as a chronic relapsing disorder and to match it with an appropriate and tailored amount of care," the researchers wrote.

The study appeared online in the January 2009 pre-print issue of the European Respiratory Journal.

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Jim Sharp on 23 Jan 09 03:54 PM EST
This study is further proof that nicotine addicts, like other drug addicts, respond poorly to confrontational techniques. Motivational approaches (such as Motivational Interviewing) that are respectful and person-centered are the most likely to be successful. This has been demonstrated by the success of inpatient addiction programs that are tobacco-free and person centered (see "Targeting nicotine addiction in a substance abuse treatment program" in Science & Practice Perspectives, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2003).

Posted by Alex Prokhorov on 27 Jan 09 10:36 AM EST
The use of the estimated "lung age" should not be regarded as a "confrontational" approach. In fact, confrontation of any kind is generally viewed as counterproductive in smoking cessation counselling. We have conducted two studies among college student smokers, and in both the "lung age" served as an exellent motivator to quit (See one of the studies described in Addictive Behaviors 33(6):757-71, 2008). The difference between the "lung age" and chronological age in both studies was 20 years on average. I submit that using the "lung age" as a motivational component among young adult smokers is appropriate.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines