Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Smokeless Tobacco Not Useful Smoking Cessation Tool in U.S., Study Finds
January 27, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Americans and Swedes have very different habits when it comes to smoking and quitting smoking -- especially when it comes to the effectiveness of smokeless tobacco for smoking cessation -- according to new research from the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and Karolinska Institutet (Sweden).

Researchers studied data of 15,000 adults from the Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, and found that while many Swedes had found using smokeless tobacco, like Snus, a useful way to stop smoking, Americans -- the majority of whom did not use smokeless tobacco -- had higher quit rates.

"With an ongoing tobacco control effort, men in the U.S. seem to be quitting smoking at higher rates than men in Sweden. And U.S. women are quitting at the same rate, unlike their counterparts in Sweden," said lead author Shu-Hong Zhu, who teaches at UCSD School of Medicine. The researchers found that though American men were more likely to use smokeless tobacco than American women, the men did not have an advantage over the women in quitting smoking.

The researchers also found that less than one percent of male American current smokers in the study switched to smokeless tobacco over one year.

The study's findings contribute to the debate on whether health professionals should recommend switching to smokeless tobacco as a way of reducing overall harm from tobacco. "Many public health officials and scientists have cautioned that the Swedish results may be unique to Sweden," Zhu said. "This research confirms that idea."

The results were published online Jan. 23, 2009 in the journal Tobacco Control.

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by maxwood on 28 Jan 09 05:11 PM EST
I find nothing in this summary to refute the idea that Snus may be of use when included in a multi-front strategy, where the would-be quitter uses Snus once or twice a day, chews gum once or twice, wears a patch, consumes a toke or two of tobacco (same brand or varied) in a vaporizer, e-cigarette or one-hitter. This approach may not yield absolute certainty at first which of the avenues was the most productive, but getting the job done is what counts.

Posted by Bill Godshall on 29 Jan 09 02:44 PM EST
The authors and peer reviewers of this article demonstrate their disdain for the lives of several million smokers who reduced their health risks by switching to smokefree tobacco products. The article also fails to ackowledge that smokefree tobacco sales have increased 50% since 2002, mostly due to smokers buying and using smokefree tobacco products as alternatives to cigarettes.

Posted by richteaz on 19 May 09 05:04 AM EDT
After using Pills, Patches, Hypnosis, and Cold Turkey; Swedish Snus is what got me OFF Cigarettes. No one will tell me Swedish Snus Isn't a Wonderful Product to Quit Smoking with! Thank You Sweden! (from the U.S.A.!)

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines