Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Manufacturers Secretly Alter Cigarettes
June 25, 2009

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Cigarettes companies have made significant design changes to their brands over the years -- resulting in differences in the amount of tobacco, smoke chemistry, and nicotine delivery -- without informing consumers of the changes, according to researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH).

The researchers studied internal tobacco-industry documents and found that the manufacturers frequently made revisions to the tobacco blend, amount of tobacco, processing, casing, flavoring, and physical design features of cigarettes that had already been brought to market. Sometimes, these changes even exceeded industry guidelines for product variation.

Greg Connolly, director of the Tobacco Control Research Program at HSPH and one of the paper's authors, said that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should require "disclosure of any changes made to tobacco products" and that regulators should allow no changes until revisions are proven to reduce addiction or harm.

The study appears online in the Journal of Tobacco Control.

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bill Godshall on 26 Jun 09 04:02 PM EDT
By grossly exaggerating and denouncing miniscule differences in the composition of cigarette brands over the past decades, Greg Connolly continues to help cigarette companies dupe the public into believing that cigarettes can be made less hazardous. Connolly also continues to dupe the public to believe that the Philip Morris backed FDA tobacco law will make cigarettes less hazardous. And yet, Connolly is fully aware that there is no such thing as a safer cigarette, and is also aware that the majority of smokers incorrectly believe that some cigarettes are less hazardous than others.

Posted by Jerry Reece on 29 Jun 09 03:02 PM EDT
I find it interesting that we are still batteling with cigarette companies. The two largest contributors to health problems in this country are both legal killers, alcohol and tobacco. Both contribute to a host of health issues that become a very expensive health insurance matter. Why not work on both?

Posted by public health educator on 29 Jun 09 04:17 PM EDT
Have you ever seen Greg Connolly present? Have you ever read his landmark paper on Engineering Tobacco Products? He is a pit bull in the world of public health and he and all of us know there is no such thing as a safe cigarette..but we start somewhere and FDA control is where we start.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments