Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Community-Based Prevention Program Helped Cut Binge Drinking, Study Finds
September 9, 2009

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

An ongoing evaluation of the Communities That Care prevention model found that communities that implemented the program had significantly lower rates of binge drinking than similar areas nearby, according to researchers at the University of Washington.

Eighth-graders exposed to Communities That Care had binge-drinking rates 37 percent lower than their peers in areas not served by the program, according to researchers David Hawkins and Richard Catalano, who developed the prevention program and are currently evaluating its effectiveness.

"This study shows we can prevent adolescent risk behaviors community wide by using this system," said Hawkins. "What makes this system different from other prevention efforts is that it provides community coalitions with scientifically based tools with which to make decisions based on what is important to each town. The key is empowering each community to make scientifically grounded decisions about what program they need. That builds ownership."

Use of alcohol and smokeless tobacco were also lower among 8th-graders in the Communities That Care areas, and the rate of delinquent behavior also was markedly lower. The findings come from the Community Youth Development Study, which compares youths living in 12 paired communities in Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Oregon, Utah, and Washington.

The study was published in the September 2009 issue of the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by silverbird on 09 Sep 09 11:23 AM EDT
The study would be much more credible had it been done by others than those that created the program. Conflict of interest.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 09 Sep 09 11:49 AM EDT
Here is the problem, these two men are two of the most respected AOD researchers in our country yet individual have to pick on their research because they don't like the outcome.

Posted by Dan Iser on 09 Sep 09 01:14 PM EDT
Let's keep in mind that CTC is not a "program" per se, but rather a systematic, community-based, approach, or "model" for preventing and reducing violence and ATOD use. This systems approach to prevention still requires the implementation of science-based, effective, prevention and intervention programs.

Posted by billinsandiego on 14 Sep 09 03:25 PM EDT
Agree with siverbird. Only in prevention "science" would there be acceptance of an evaluation made by the developers themselves. Proof of effectivelness requires objectivity - perhaps Hawkins and Catalano might fund or help fund an independent group to conduct the study. That would at least give it half-an-arms length of objectivity.

Posted by Chris on 23 Sep 09 12:57 PM EDT
Community based prevention programs are not new. The 1980's was an era of comprehensive prevention and education programs all over the country. Remember "It Takes A Village to Raise a Child". Then DARE and law enforcement took over and it was downhill from there. Good programs can work no matter who does the study.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments