Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Study: Tax Increases Result in Lower Alcohol-Related Mortality
November 17, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

A new study has concluded that increased taxation on alcohol results in fewer deaths caused by or related to the effects of drinking, CNN reported Nov. 13.

Researchers focused on alcohol tax increases and mortality in the state of Alaska over a 28-year period. Deaths related to alcohol use dropped by 29 percent when taxes were raised in 1983; a further 11-percent reduction in alcohol-related deaths correspoded to a 2002 tax increase. The researchers included the number of deaths directly attributed to alcohol, like alcohol poisoning and alcoholic liver disease, and deaths linked to alcohol, like cirrhosis and chronic pancreatitis. 

"Increasing alcohol taxes saves lives; that's the bottom line," said Alexander Wagenaar, a professor at the University of Florida's Department of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research and the study's lead author. "There's no reason to think the experience in Alaska would be different than anywhere else."

The Alaska research supports a study from Finland that found that when the Finnish government lowered the tax on alcohol by 33 to 44 percent in an effort to protect domestic alcohol sales, consumption of alcohol increased by 50 percent, arrests for drunk and disorderly conduct increased by 11 percent, and deaths attributed to alcohol increased by 20 percent.

The alcohol industry is on record opposing any tax increase. "Based on historical evidence, raising taxes on alcohol beverages would have a highly negative impact on the economy," said Harry Wiles, executive director of the group American Beverage Licensees.

The study was published Nov. 13, 2008 in the online version of the American Journal of Public Health

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:
(Comments now appear first to last)

Posted by Bill Godshall on 18 Nov 08 11:32 AM EST
So why have only a few D & A prevention, treatment and recovery groups advocated to increase alcohol and/or drinks taxes? Last year when Allegheny County officials proposed a 10% drinks tax, the measure wasn't endorsed by MADD, the state D&A prevention or treatment providers associations or other D&A policy advocates. Fortunately, the drinks tax was approved by one vote. Since then, PA tavern and restaurant trade groups have filed multiple lawsuits to overturn the tax, and still no support has been voiced for the tax by other public health advcoates.

Posted by Michael J. McFadden on 24 Nov 08 04:47 PM EST
Would Bill Godshall (president of SmokeFree PA) prefer the drink tax to be the equivalent of NY's total cigarette tax? A 500% or so tax on the base cost of alcohol would raise the cost of a six-pack to $40 or $50 with a cheap bottle of gin coming in at about the same. It would discourage children from drinking, and I'm sure Bill would agree that's a good thing. And it would reduce adult role-modeling of alcohol consumption as well, another thing he'd probably support. Throw in a regulation where alkies eating dinner at a restaurant have to "just step outside for a few quick gulps" of their Chardonney and we'll be right on track to a nice level playing field for addictive and carcinogenic volatile alcohol and nicotine. Michael J. McFadden Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

Posted by Michael J. McFadden on 05 Mar 09 02:46 AM EST
Wait! I've had an even BETTER idea than a 500% drinks tax! Why don't we do what Obama and PA's governor Rendell are doing to the poorest of the poor: those forced to roll their own cigarettes from loose tobacco? THAT group is getting hit with a THREE THOUSAND PERCENT increase in tax: from about a dollar to over thirty dollars a pound. Let's see..... hmmmmm.... that would make a pint of beer at the pub about $50 or so. PERFECT! That way the CHILDREN won't be drinking anymore! After all, 95% of alcoholics began drinking before they were 21. It's a Win-Win for EVERYONE! A Smoke-Free and Alcohol-Free World! I can smell the roses.... Michael J. McFadden Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, brief, and on-topic. Comments are for discussion of the above article, not general rants or manifestos. Serial comments intended to circumvent the 250-word limit may be deleted.

  2. Do not post promotional web links, personal information or requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercial posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.