Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Study Says Pre-Drinking Part of a 'New Culture of Intoxication'
December 18, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Researchers say that banning happy hours and other drink promotions unintentionally encourages young people to find alternative sources for cheap alcohol before hitting the bars. 

A new study said the phenomenon known as 'pre-drinking' or 'pre-gaming' is an effort to maximize the effect of alcohol without the concurrent financial costs associated with buying drinks at nightclubs and bars. The study's authors cast the practice as representing a "new culture of intoxication," where the main goal is simply to get drunk.

"Many young bar-goers have found a way to avoid paying high alcohol prices in bars: they pre-drink," said Samantha Wells, a researcher at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health in Canada and a study co-author. "We have begun to see that this intense and ritualized activity among young adults may result in harmful consequences."

Recent research has shown that a large percentage of young people pre-drink, and those that do are likely to experience negative consequences. Pre-drinkers who consume a large amount of alcohol prior to heading out for a night on the town have an increased risk of blackouts, hangovers and alcohol poisoning, as well as an increased likelihood of using other drugs like cannabis and cocaine, researchers said.

To discourage or reduce pre-drinking, researchers suggested addressing the imbalance of alcohol costs on and off premises, called on bars to do more to attract patrons so drinking can be monitored by staff, and said policies and programming aimed at changing drinking norms should be developed.

The study was published online and will appear in the January 2009 issue of the journal Addiction

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:
(Comments now appear first to last)

Posted by Kris Bowers on 19 Dec 08 09:30 AM EST
In the opeing sentence of this article, I think the writer has, perhaps unwittingly (or editorially) supported the corollary effect of the findings of this study by implying that researchers say that drinking establishments' restriction of happy hours causes young people to find other sources as if the behavior of drinking before social events is an accepted expectation. I think a more accurate opening would be "Researchers say that banning happy hours and other drink promotions has an unintentional effect. Young people seek alternative sources for cheap alcohol before hitting the bars." Responsibility for behaviors has to stay with the person. The bars may have created a normalized behavior pattern called 'happy hour,' but the person who does the drinking is still responsible for the behavior.

Posted by Stevan W. Pierce, Jr. on 19 Dec 08 10:26 AM EST
I would like to add that the suggestions to discourage or reduce pre-drinking would not necessarily accomplish what they intend on doing. It is unfortunate that the author/s failed to use scholarly sources which has resulted in a best guess estimate to fix the issue/s at hand.

Posted by Not Buying It on 19 Dec 08 10:57 AM EST
I wonder who exactly funded and promoted this study. Seems to be more of an attempt to prevent legislation banning happy hour then an attempt to prevent alcohol abuse. "called on bars to do more to attract patrons so drinking can be monitored by staff" is a pretty obvious way to say "it's safer for them to drink here, where we can monitor them then somewhere else".

Posted by maxwood on 19 Dec 08 02:15 PM EST
"increased likelihood of using other drugs like cannabis and cocaine, researchers said." Aside from the insult mentioning cannabis with cocaine, the deceit here is in overlooking the real "danger" that many youngsters might use cannabis INSTEAD of alcohol and tobacco, destroying the profit empire in each of those drugs and drastically reducing Big Pharma's profits a few decades down the road.

Posted by Rob H. on 19 Dec 08 03:36 PM EST
"Aside from the insult mentioning cannabis with cocaine..." It's pretty common for drug users to use more than one type of recreational drug. For instance, in my county, 96% of juvenile arrestees who use meth also use marijuana. And among arrestees who use cocaine, E, or mushrooms, 100% also use marijuana. Face it, when people "party," they frequently use multiple drugs. While it doesn't seem to make sense to use pot and cocaine, it's not unusual. Not an insult, a fact.

Posted by George Richardson on 22 Dec 08 11:52 AM EST
I don't think article is addressing "responsibility". "and said policies and programming aimed at changing drinking norms should be developed"- This suggests policy changes that influence norms. Personal responsibility doesn't exclude effective policies aimed at groups. Consider Zimbardo's prison experiments or Milgram's shock experiments. Context matters, and drinking in public areas is often safer for young people than drinking at home. This study appeared in a top notch peer reviewed journal. This means that it has been checked for bias, and by multiple scholars. And I don't see how this article is related to decriminalization of marijuana. What's with the conspiracy theories..?

Posted by Coleen Chapin-Glasscock on 22 Dec 08 02:26 PM EST
Where have the researchers been? This drinking before going out is a pre-alcoholic or on set of alcoholic behavior. Get a buzz on so one can drink and socialize has been a mixed up definition for "social" drinking for as long as I can remember. What about the dangers of driving with this mindset or behaviors? It wasn't mentioned, hmmm. Interesting.

Posted by Rachel Hassinger, Join Together on 22 Dec 08 03:40 PM EST
Thank you for the comments! We revised the first sentence of the article to more accurately reflect the study findings. For more information, read the study abstract and results.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, brief, and on-topic. Comments are for discussion of the above article, not general rants or manifestos. Serial comments intended to circumvent the 250-word limit may be deleted.

  2. Do not post promotional web links, personal information or requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercial posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.