Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Secondhand Smoke Exposure Plummets, CDC Study Finds
July 11, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Far fewer Americans are exposed to secondhand smoke than a decade ago, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study finds, and health advocates say that the findings show the need for more states to ban indoor smoking.

The Associated Press reported July 10 that the report found that 46 percent of U.S. nonsmokers had biomarkers for nicotine exposure in the blood in tests conducted between 1999 and 2004, down from 84 percent in samples gathered in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

The CDC said the decline was due to indoor-smoking bans and the overall decline in smoking in the U.S. Researchers found that secondhand-smoke exposure declined more significantly among whites and Hispanics than among blacks, and that 60 percent of children ages 4-11 were still being exposed, likely at home.

The study was based on levels of cotinine, a nicotine metabolite, in the blood of participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

"The dramatic decline in youth smoking since 1997 is powerful proof that scientifically proven measures, implemented primarily at the state and local level, are working," said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. "These include higher cigarette prices resulting from state cigarette tax increases and the 1998 state tobacco settlement; a growing number of state and local laws requiring smoke-free workplaces and public places; and effective, well-funded tobacco prevention programs run by the states and nationally by the American Legacy Foundation."

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Thomas Laprade on 15 Jul 08 01:53 AM EDT
An alternative to smoking bans If the public was honestly and truthfully informed about the effects of second-hand smoke, there would be fewer no-smoking laws in this country. A little smoke from a handful of crushed leaves and some paper that is mixed with the air of a decently ventilated venue is going to harm or kill you? There has never been a single study showing that exposure to the low levels of smoke found in bars and restaurants with decent modern ventilation and filtration systems kills or harms anyone. As to the annoyance of smoking, a compromise between smokers and non-smokers can be reached, through setting a quality standard and the use of modern ventilation technology. Air ventilation can easily create a comfortable environment that removes not just passive smoke, but also and especially the potentially serious contaminants that are independent from smoking. Thomas Laprade

Posted by History Buff on 14 Jul 08 10:47 PM EDT
Why any one would listen to any one connected to Tobacco Free Kids is a mystery. They were formed by the RWJF who buys bans thru grants to fit their agenda geared to sell the no-smoke products. The media is now part of the SCAM!

Posted by virgil k on 14 Jul 08 09:45 PM EDT
Wood smoke is completely different than Tobacco smoke. What the good Doctor said was true but only for tobacco smoke. Wood/Forrest fires are much more dangerous. Wood smoke particulates are sharp and work much deeper into the lungs. The good Doctor should look up Burning Issues and he will then understand the difference. Just use this link, http://burningissues.org http://burningissues.org/car-www/science/particle-size.htm For a view of wood particulates use this link http://www.emagazine.com/view/?1107

Posted by b rogers on 14 Jul 08 08:18 PM EDT
Nicotine is a naturally occuring substance with great medicinal value. It can be found in nightshade plants such as the tomato, potato, eggplant, sweet peppers,chili peppers and tobacco. Drug companies now want it to treat alzheimers and dementia among other things. Gee, are they just now finding out what smokers have known all along and are trying to capitalize on it? Is this one of the reasons they want the FDA to take over tobacco and regulate the nicotine? Is this what the banning of smoking in public places is about? Suddenly second hand smoke is more dangerous than forest fires? Come on people, it's all about greed.

Posted by freedom4me on 14 Jul 08 06:55 PM EDT
To have Butte County's blue summer sky blotted out by smoke day after day is certainly unprecedented. Nevertheless, Dr. Mark Lundberg, the county health officer, said he doesn't think many people will suffer lasting damage to their health from breathing smoke from the wildfires. In a phone interview Friday, Lundberg said people have asked him if exposure to the smoky air will increase their risk of getting lung cancer. He tells them any increase in risk would be "infinitesimally small." "Our bodies are made to eliminate this," he said, explaining humans have natural mechanisms that clean their lungs. Lots of people are feeling the smoke now — they get hoarse or cough and sneeze, or they feel some tightness in their chest and their eyes may smart, he said. But once the smoke finally disappears, so will the symptoms. Most people will bounce right back. http://www.chicoer.com/news/ci_9866501 But there's NO safe exposure to SHS? Anti-smoking is nothing more than a big money maker and you're all in on it.

Posted by Pagen on 14 Jul 08 12:54 PM EDT
Liars! This whole ETS is bull. The smoking ban has closed over 300 bars and 88 restaurants here in Colorado alone. The casino's are down 30%. What about all these family own businesses? It is amazing that we have air filters in labs where the biggest deseases are and thats fine but air filters don't take care of ETS, give me a break! What about people that are exposed to Freon or methyline cloride on a daily bases and that's ok. This is all a money making game. Between the government making money off the taxes of tobacco sales and Robert Woods Johnson Foundation and their push for smoking bans so that they can sell their nicotine replacement therapies.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.