Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Secondhand Smoke Exposure May Lead to Youth Nicotine Addiction
October 1, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

New research suggests that exposure to secondhand smoke may lead to nicotine addiction among the children of smokers, the Calgary Herald reported Sept. 30.

Canadian researchers studied 1,488 students ages 10-12 who had never smoked but were exposed to secondhand smoke, and found that five percent reported symptoms of nicotine dependence.

"They told us, 'I want it, I need it,' and that they are physically and mentally addicted," Jennifer O'Loughlin, a researcher at the University of Montreal, said. "Why would a kid do that?"

Further research is necessary to determine a causal relationship between secondhand smoke exposure and nicotine addiction, the researchers said.

"Most (of those reporting nicotine dependence) came from homes of smokers" or had friends who already smoked, said Mathieu Belanger, research director of the Medical School of New Brunswick at Sherbrooke University. "Maybe there's a genetic path we're not yet exploring."

The findings were published online in the July 23, 2008 issue of the journal Addictive Behaviors.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by ichoosefreedom on 02 Oct 08 11:10 AM EDT
Look at the results of this "study". The confidence interval on both effects included 1.0, which means no evidence of any effect. An odds ration of 1.2 or or 1.1 means very tiny positive affect, but when the confidence interval for statistical significance includes 1.0 which it does in both results, that means their is no statistically significant finding. In other words, another bogus study in a long line of money makers for a publication called "Addictive Behaviors"...what results do you THINK would be reported? The scientific community is starting to speak out on this kind of junk being passed off as "science". Unfortunately, Epidemiology is going to be caught in the cross hairs and will be totally destroyed in the process. Who cares? Everyone's made money off of it. While people are made to believe this kind of crap.

Posted by HistoryBuff on 02 Oct 08 05:07 PM EDT
As nicotine IS in the same FOOD group as potato, tomato, cauliflower, green pepper and other foods, do they say 'got to have it' for those also?

Posted by virgilk on 05 Oct 08 12:57 PM EDT
Epidemiology has never been able to pinpoint any cause for a disease and never will. The use to which anti-smoking is making a laughing stock of it is only pointing out what a waste of time it is. I read the other day that students are flocking to Epidemiology. Must be because the requirements nonexistent. Next thing you know, basket weaving will be a science.

Posted by Laila-Rose on 17 May 09 08:31 PM EDT
I myself am a youth who hasa foolishly found herself addicted to nicotine after being around second hand smoke my entire life. I have not yet picked up a ciggerete but the desire burns me like fire. This is not a joke. Any advice would be highly appreciated

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines