Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Scientists Look at Brain Region's Role in Addiction
October 30, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Researchers at the University of Nottingham in the U.K. are testing their theory that brain structure may biologically predispose some individuals to addiction, Science Daily reported Oct. 22.

The study will look at the impact that abnormalities in the frontal cortex -- the part of the brain involved in decision making -- have on a person's odds of developing an addiction. Individuals with such flaws may be less able to assess the risks of drug use and more apt to make bad decisions, researchers said.

"Evidence suggests that a large percentage of the population try drugs but only a small proportion of experimental users -- roughly about 15 percent -- will make the transition to full-blown addiction," said researcher Lee Hogarth. "Our study will move us a step closer to understanding why some people can use drugs recreationally without becoming hooked, while others will go on to develop clinical dependence."

The scientists plan to compare students and adults who self-report as social and daily smokers. The researchers will measure participants' brain activity through MRI technology and by linking an unpleasant noise (as a negative consequence) with obtaining cigarettes to see if the subjects smoke, regardless -- an indication that they may be dependent.

"There is currently a debate as to whether addicts are responsible for their addictive behavior, which has implications for the funding of their healthcare and treatment," Hogarth said. "If our hypothesis proves correct, we would argue that addicts are intentionally choosing to take drugs, rather than being controlled, like robots, by urges beyond their control. However, this does not mean that addicts are morally culpable for their choices, because they cannot help being vulnerable to a distortion of the neural system that computes their choices."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by John E. on 03 Nov 08 05:41 PM EST
"only a small proportion of experimental users -- roughly about 15 percent -- will make the transition to full-blown addiction" 15 per cent? That's a lot! If 15 per cent of sugar users developed health problems as serious as addiction, they'd regulate it or ban it. It's time we took addicton seriously. Fifteen per cent of anyone with anything looks like an epeidemic to me.

Posted by Ken Schonlau on 03 Nov 08 06:47 PM EST
Brain research is interesting but is not going to address and reduce addiction problems. The field is ignoring the need for practical recovery support housing and community centers.

Posted by DT M on 04 Nov 08 11:49 AM EST
Writer John E is correct: We need more attention on the remedies for addictions than scientific explanations on how we become addicted. Thousands die every day due to the ravages of addictions; a treatable disease.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines