Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Localized Declines in Female Life Expectancy Blamed on Smoking, Obesity
April 24, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Overall life expectancy for women in the U.S. rose by more than six years between 1959 and 2001, but remained flat or fell in many poor and rural areas.

The AFP reported April 23 that researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health and the University of Washington said that in 1,000 mostly rural and poor counties, life expectancy began declining in the 1980s "primarily because of chronic diseases related to smoking, overweight and obesity, and high blood pressure."

About one-fifth of U.S. women saw their life expectancy decline or hold steady during the study period, largely in the south, Appalachia, and parts of the Midwest and Texas. "There is now evidence that there are large parts of the population in the United States whose health has been getting worse for about two decades," said lead author Majid Ezzati of the Harvard School of Public Health.

"Life expectancy decline is something that has traditionally been considered a sign that the health and social systems have failed, as has been the case in parts of Africa and Eastern Europe," said co-author Christopher Murray of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington. "The fact that this is happening to a large number of Americans should be a sign that the U.S. health system needs serious rethinking."

The study was published in the journal PLoS Medicine.

This article summarizes an external report or press release on research published in a scientific journal. When available, links to the sources are provided above.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by ichoosefreedom on 13 Nov 08 11:33 PM EST
You mean I won't live until I'm 95 peeing my pants and drooling on myself while not knowing my grandchildren? The only people this is a problem for are the people who make money off us living longer. Maybe you should start butting out of our lives. Who ASKED you to "protect" us and force us to live into our 90s? Did you ever think these are OUR lives and WE get to decide, not YOU? You people who make your money off these bogus studies and drugs from your forced laws and bans need to back off.

Posted by SStahl on 14 Nov 08 12:20 AM EST
Uh...Jean Louise Calment, just for starters. Many of the people who've lived the longest on this earth have chosen to smoke. As for obesity, that probably depends on (1) what one considers "obese" and (2) the nature/source of the gained weight, i.e. is it fast/junk foods or just consuming too much of what would otherwise be a normal diet. You know, the biggest problem to one's health is one's stress level. One good way to reduce one's stress might be to stop trying to control other people because it's a futile attempt at the impossible. So, maybe the best thing would be for these "researchers" to start working more on bettering themselves than on trying to dictate what's best for others.

Posted by virgilk on 14 Nov 08 11:02 AM EST
Why wouldn't being poor have more more effect? Women working harder on less nutritious food, no health care and stress beyond belief makes more sense. Most of these are caused by well meaning do gooders in government and social services. We should not forget those trying to control our lives for their own profit.

Posted by Pete on 02 Jun 09 12:36 PM EDT
There seems to be an assumption being made here that living longer just means spending more years in a state of helpless infirmity so as to create more profit for others (presumably nursing homes). But that model of aging seems particular to our modern Western system, where health care is really about disease management rather than wellness, living a good life means being increasingly sedentary and inactive as we age, and eating well means subsisting on a diet that is high in calories while low in nutritional value. In many more "primitive" parts of the world, you'll find 95 year olds who, rather than pee and drool on themselves, walk a few miles each day just to get to where they need to be to work on their farms or herd their sheep. I guess we should feel pity for these poor unfortunates since they don't understand the concept of retirement and they lack important services like nursing home care.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines