Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Kids Often Gather Together for Safety, Study Says
February 23, 2006

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

Young people often gather in groups to protect themselves from violence and alcohol and drug related problems, according to researchers in the U.K.

PNN reported Feb. 21 that a study of parents and youths in Glasgow, Scotland, found that kids move in packs to share knowledge of local hazards, such as violent gangs and adults with drug problems. The study runs counter to the idea that groups of young people hanging out together in public is a sign of trouble.

"We were impressed by the positive part that young people's peer groups played in helping them to stay safe," said lead researcher Malcolm Hill, director of the Glasgow Center for the Child and Society. "Parents were generally unaware of its importance and young people themselves recognized that sticking together in groups could, in spite of their self-protective intentions, appear threatening to some adults ... Both parents and children in these deprived neighborhoods were keenly aware of risks within their communities and the young people had often become experts in avoiding potential trouble. They knew about avoiding people, places and certain times of day, and they deployed a range of other strategies, including keeping a low profile or asking friends or parents to accompany them in order to keep safe."

The study also found that parents in low-income communities often restricted the activities of their children to protect them from known dangers in the community, and that children were generally receptive to these restrictions. "The parents we interviewed described sophisticated strategies they had adopted to minimize their children's exposure to danger and to guard them against temptations to go 'off the rails'," said study co-author Paul Seaman. "They also had high aspirations for their children, wanting them to have better opportunities in life than they had experienced. What appeared to be lacking was the capacity to fulfill the hopes they held, especially in education, because they did not have the knowledge or resources to realize them."

The study was conducted for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.