Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Efficacy of National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign Questioned
November 8, 2006

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

An evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign provides credible evidence that the campaign was not effective in reducing youth drug use, according to a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO).

Between 1998 and 2004 Congress appropriated more than $1.2 billion to the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) for the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, a project that aimed to prevent and reduce youth drug use (primarily marijuana and inhalants).

In 2005, Westat, Inc., completed an ONDCP-funded evaluation of the campaign.

At the mandate of the Senate Appropriations Committee, a team of GAO social scientists reviewed and assessed Westat’s evaluation, applying generally accepted social science research standards.

Following are some of the conclusions from the GAO report:

  • While the ONDCP does not believe that the Westat evaluation reflects the campaign’s effectiveness, the GAO concludes that the Westat study used "generally accepted and appropriate sampling and analytic techniques" and established "reliable and sufficiently powerful measures of campaign exposure."

  • Youth and parents’ recall of campaign advertisements increased over time and their impressions of the advertisements were favorable.

  • There was no evidence that exposure to the campaign affected initiation or cessation of marijuana use,  either during the entire period of the campaign or during the period from 2002 to 2004 when the campaign was redirected and focused on marijuana use.

  • The campaign generally had no effect on the anti-drug attitudes and beliefs of youth who did not use marijuana. However, greater exposure to the anti-drug ads was associated with increases in the belief that their peers used marijuana regularly.

  • Parental exposure was associated with changes in beliefs about discussing drug use with their children and the extent to which they had these conversations, but did not lead to increased monitoring of youth.

The GAO recommends that "Congress should consider limiting appropriations for the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign . . . until ONDCP is able to provide credible evidence of the effectiveness of exposure to the campaign on youth drug use outcomes or provide other credible options for a media campaign approach."

A full copy of the GAO report, including responses from ONDCP, is available online.

For details, including data charts, source information and caveats, download the PDF file at www.cesar.umd.edu/cesar/cesarfax/vol15/15-44.pdf.

Reprinted from CESAR Fax, a weekly, one-page overview of timely substance abuse trends or issues, from The Center on Substance Abuse Research (CESAR) at the University of Maryland. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines