Prop. 36 Implementation CriticizedJune 30, 2004
Research Summary
A new report concludes that California's Proposition 36, which directs drug offenders to treatment instead of jail, is being badly managed in Ventura County, the Los Angeles Times reported June 22.The 93-page report released by the Ventura County Grand Jury said the problems with the program have "compromised public safety and health."
The report says the county's Behavioral Health Department, which runs the three-year-old program, has failed to compile reliable data, neglected to conduct enough random drug testing, and refused to fully share with law-enforcement agencies the results of tests that were conducted.
Law-enforcement officials and District Attorney Greg Totten agree with the findings, adding that the program's inadequacies may have contributed to an increase in crime.
"Everyone in law enforcement wants to see drug offenders treated and change their behavior," said Totten. "But if you strictly focus on a touchy-feely social-services treatment model, it doesn't take into account the danger these people can pose."
The grand-jury report recommended that control of Proposition 36 be placed under the county's executive officer. It also called for more frequent drug testing and the immediate disclosure of results to law enforcement.
COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE: