Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Workplace Drug Testing Slows with Economy
May 22, 2003

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

As the economy falters and hiring slows, many employers have decided not to spend money on testing job applicants for drug use, Knight-Ridder Newspapers reported May 11.

Testing for illegal drugs became fairly standard for employers after the federal government launched its drug-free workplace initiative in the 1980s. On a yearly basis, 25 million job applicants are tested for drugs, with another 25 million existing employees subject to drug screenings.

Although workplace drug testing has been credited by some for spurring higher productivity and decreasing worker's-compensation claims, the practice has declined in recent years.

Dug-testing industry growth, which averaged more than 12.5 percent annually during the 1990s, has dropped to only about 1 percent a year.

A 2001 survey by the American Management Association found that 61 percent of companies screen job applicants, a drop from 1996, when 68 percent of employers screened candidates. Because of the weak economy, many companies are reviewing spending and eliminating drug testing for employees whose jobs do not pose safety risks, according to Meldron Young, a human-resources practice consultant at the association.

"They probably won't waste their money trying to do it," Young said. "You have people that are moving into the upper echelons of corporate America now that kind of take the stance that if it's not affecting the person's performance, it's not an issue."

Young added that most companies have not quantified the before-and-after results of workplace drug testing to determine its advantages to the company.

"Employers right now are so in survival mode," said Young. "[Testing] doesn't contribute to the bottom line right now."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.