Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Study: School Drug Testing Doesn't Deter Drug Use
May 19, 2003

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

The first large-scale national study on school drug testing shows that screenings performed in schools do not discourage students from using drugs, the New York Times reported May 17.

Many schools began testing students who participated in sports or extracurricular activities after the U.S. Supreme Court permitted the screenings as a means to curb alcohol and other drug use among adolescents.

But the study, which involved 76,000 students nationwide, found that drug use was just as prevalent in schools with testing procedures as those without a drug-screening program.

"It suggests that there really isn't an impact from drug testing as practiced," said Dr. Lloyd D. Johnston, a study researcher from the University of Michigan. "It's the kind of intervention that doesn't win the hearts and minds of children. I don't think it brings about any constructive changes in their attitudes about drugs or their belief in the dangers associated with using them."

According to the study, 37 percent of 12th-graders in schools that tested for drugs said they had smoked marijuana in the last year, compared with 36 percent in schools with no screening. In addition, 21 percent of 12th-graders in schools with testing said they had used cocaine, heroin, or other illegal drugs in the last year, compared with 19 percent in schools with no drug testing.

Similar results were found for every drug and grade level.

"Schools should not implement a drug-testing program until they're proven to work," said Dr. Linn Goldberg, a professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, who conducted a limited drug-testing study at two Oregon high schools last year. "They're too expensive. It's like having experimental surgery that's never been shown to work."

Other researchers not involved in the study said the findings may suggest that schools are doing a poor job of testing. For instance, they said that the urinalysis conducted by schools could be faulty, the supervision too lenient, or the opportunities for cheating vast.

Despite the findings, the National School Boards Association said that schools should continue to test students. "I'm not saying school districts should ignore that study," said Naomi Gittins, an association lawyer. "I think it's a good idea that schools take a look at that study. It's an important decision that they're making."

The National Institute on Drug Abuse, which helped finance the research along with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said it would conduct several more studies before ruling on the effectiveness of school drug testing.

The study's findings are published in the April issue of the Journal of School Health, a peer-reviewed publication of the American School Health Association.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help or general promotions for your organization (Get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.