Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Workplace Smoking Bans Make a Difference
June 19, 2002

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

A new study shows that smoking bans implemented in workplaces throughout the United States are having an impact in reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, Reuters reported June 18.

Using data from a 1988-1994 national health and nutrition survey, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) investigated exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace. The research involved 4,952 workers aged 17 and older who were nonsmokers and had no exposure to cigarette smoke at home.

For the study, the researchers measured the amount of cotinine, a breakdown product of nicotine, in workers in seven job categories. Cotinine levels are used to determined the degree of exposure to secondhand smoke.

Overall, the study found that workplace exposure to secondhand smoke has been greatly reduced through smoking bans and other restrictions. According to the research, the average cotinine levels in workers from 1991-1994 were lower than in 1988-1991. In addition, the percentage of individuals who said they smelled smoke at work decreased from 39 percent from 1988-1991 to 25 percent in 1991-1994.

Researchers said the decreases "are consistent with changes in formal policies during the same time period."

However, the study also found that blue-collar or service workers continue to be at a greater risk for passive smoking than white-collar employees.

The researchers found that those working in the farming, forestry, and fishing industries had the lowest levels of cotinine in their urine. On the other hand, operators, fabricators, and laborers had the highest urine-cotinine levels.

In the service industry, the study found that waiters, waitresses, and non-construction workers had the highest levels of cotinine in their urine, while farm and nursery workers and teachers had the lowest levels.

The study's findings are published in the June 2002 issue of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.