Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Researcher Spotlights Effective Youth Anti-Smoking Ads
August 22, 2000

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
Research Summary

A researcher has looked at numerous anti-tobacco campaigns to determine which ones teens consider most effective, the Los Angeles Times reported Aug. 20.

Connie Pechmann, a University of California at Irvine professor, just completed research on anti-smoking television advertisements across the United States. She determined that these commercials often use ineffective tactics.

As part of the research, Pechmann had 1,000 Orange County, Calif., youths look at anti-smoking campaigns from California, Vermont, Massachusetts and other states. "You have to have the right strategy, the right message, the right ad and the right spokesperson," said Pechmann. "One good message is to stress that secondhand smoke hurts innocent victims. Kids get very upset by that."

Another message that's effective with youth, said Pechmann, is that smokers have chosen a bad path in life and are destined for trouble.

Her research determined that anti-smoking ads that stress long-term health effects or cosmetic issues are not that effective.

Pechmann added that it's best to focus on one anti-smoking theme, whether it's the dangers of secondhand smoke or the negative social perception of smoking. "You want to have a laser approach," she noted.

The study also showed that the person delivering the message is just as important as the message itself. "You need to use young people in the ads to talk to other young people," Pechmann said. "People listen to spokespeople that are like them; they view the info as more credible and more relevant."

With some U.S. states spending millions of dollars on anti-smoking education, Pechmann said, "it's tough to know if you're influencing headstrong teenagers."

Some states, like California, have programs in place to measure the effectiveness of anti-smoking campaigns. The state Department of Education's Healthy Kids office provides information about effective, research-based teaching strategies to local school districts. In addition, school districts receiving tobacco-tax education funds must survey their students' health behaviors, indicate how success will be measured and report their results to the state.

"New research comes across my desk every day," said Marilyn Pritchard, who oversees anti-tobacco programs for Orange County, Calif. "We try and change our programs based on the latest information on what's successful."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:
(Comments now appear first to last)

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, brief, and on-topic. Comments are for discussion of the above article, not general rants or manifestos. Serial comments intended to circumvent the 250-word limit may be deleted.

  2. Do not post promotional web links, personal information or requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercial posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.