Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts
Please leave this field empty

Already signed up?
Login here
Support Us
Support Join Together with a tax-deductible gift today.

Donate



Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP


Connect with us

 

Sentencing Commission Releases Guidelines on Alternative Penalties
May 4, 2010

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Judges may depart from federal sentencing guidelines in order to refer offenders with alcohol and other drug problems to addiction treatment or other alternatives to incarceration, according to new guidelines issued by the U.S. Sentencing Commission.

"The commission has heard from virtually every sector of the criminal-justice community that there is a great need for alternatives to incarceration," said commission chairman William K. Sessions III. "Expanding the availability of alternatives to straight incarceration is a public-safety issue. Providing flexibility in sentencing for certain low-level, non-violent offenders helps lower recidivism, is cost effective, and protects the public. The commission's action in this area amounts to a very modest but important step in the right direction."

The amendment to federal sentencing policy (PDF) "informs courts that departures from the guidelines may be warranted in situations where an offender's criminal activity is related to a treatment issue such as drug or alcohol abuse or significant mental illness and sentencing options such as home or community confinement or intermittent confinement would serve a specific treatment purpose."

The commission also recommended that courts "take into consideration the effectiveness of residential treatment programs as part of their decision to impose community confinement."

Separately, the commission also gave courts more discretion to consider age, mental and emotional conditions, physical condition, and military service, when relevant, in determining sentences.

The amendments issued by the commission were due to Congress by May 1. They will automatically go into effect on Nov. 1 unless blocked legislatively by Congress.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Chris on 05 May 10 11:02 AM CDT
Being "sentenced" to treatment for chemical dependecy does not work as motivation for change. I work in a prison chemical dependency program. Roughly 85% of our clients have been mandated or voluntarily entered into community treatment as a means of avoiding going to prison. They either continued to use throughout those treatments or returned to use immediately after completion. It seems like an incredible waste of money on the states part and only prolonged torment by their disease for themselves and their families. A piece of what keeps addicts using is the illusion that prison, intitutions, or death will never happen to them. By sentencing them to community treatment to avoid incarceration we are reinforcing that thinking.

Posted by Luis Lozano on 05 May 10 11:13 AM CDT
Finally a step in the right direction. Judges have had their hands tied for too long on sentencing. Now maybe mandatory sentences are next.

Posted by silverbird on 05 May 10 11:46 AM CDT
coherced treatment works, there is plenty of research on that especially in a drug court environment. This is a step in the right direction, but judges need to know a lot more about how best to make sure treatment works then just changing the guidelines.

Posted by Marie Officer on 05 May 10 11:49 AM CDT
I agree that this is a step in the right direction. Will it work 100% of the time? No. But as Dr. Brady says in the HBO special, Addictions, hooking them in is our responsibility. I work with a predominately criminal justice population that usually does not want to be here to start with. But having them mandated to be here provides me time and opportunity to use tools such as Motivational Interveiwing to help change them from Precontemplation to Decision toAction. That is my job. Sending them to me just gives me a chance to do my job to help them find the motivation to do the work to create a better life that is free of substances ad trouble with the law.

Posted by rachel on 05 May 10 02:57 PM CDT
chris - maybe your treatment program is the problem. having a more positive attitude like marie officer might help. this shows that sentencing people to just any treatment program isn't the answer. we need to make sure our treatment programs are quality with quality providers. we also need to make sure our measure of success isn't necessarily "drug-free" (whatever that means) but that these people have stable, healthy, productive lives. when that happens, sobriety follows.

Posted by Diane Kopperman on 06 May 10 03:01 PM CDT
Tx in prison is less effective than tx in the community partly because inmates enter tx for the wrong reasons (i.e., to have an easier time in prison) and partly because the punishments for using in prison are so high that it is easy for an inmate to choose to not use. Tx on the outside teaches the client how to manage his life in the real world. Whether the motivation is intrinsic or extrinsic is irrelevant. As most of you attested to, if we have clients in tx long enough, we begin to see changes in client's thinking and recovery is therefore possible. I typically see this change after about 12 weeks of concerted effort and regular attendance in tx. Extrinsic motivation has been replaced with intrinsic motivation.

Posted by John on 10 May 10 03:25 PM CDT
Sorry Chris, but I totaly disagree. I have worked as a Drug Court Counselor for the last 5 years and have seen the exact opposite to your views. We graduate 6 out of 10 and of those about 60% are not rearrested in the 3 years following Drug Court graduation. I have seen them come in screaming and hollering that they aren't done only to see them as very changed people a year later. Maybe your the problem-might want to take a look at that.

Posted by Bob on 11 May 10 03:34 PM CDT
Chris works "in a prison chemical dependency program." Of course he doesn't like this new approach. He wants to keep his job! Treatment works. It may take several attempts... but it works.

Posted by Kathy with Pathways For Change Pensacola Fl on 18 May 10 01:39 PM CDT
I strongly disagree with Chris, John is right on target, We are a long term inhouse treatment program and our society needs one in every community. Our clients are on community control or probation with a condition that they complete either the 9,12 or 18 month program. 85% of our graduates have not been rearrested. As we all know we can't arrest our way out of this problem.

Posted by Jessica on 23 May 10 08:45 PM CDT
Perhaps a combination of confinement followed by treatment for a total of the recomended sentence should be considered.In most cases the offender is aware that the behavior is illegal, so prison time is warranted, but wont solve the core problem.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

(Submissions are reviewed by staff before publication)

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments