Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Will FDA Eventually Ban Menthol Cigarettes?
June 18, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

As legislation allowing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) power to regulate tobacco products clears Congress, some tobacco experts are focusing on the potential for the agency to use its new powers to ban menthol cigarettes, Reuters reported June 17.

The legislation passed by Congress bans flavorings like chocolate and cherry, but excludes menthol-flavored cigarettes from the ban. The legislation, which is awaiting President Barack Obama's signature, calls for the FDA to examine the medical effects and marketing of menthol cigarettes and their impact on blacks, Hispanics, and other groups, with a report due back in 18 months.

Based on these considerations, the FDA could either ban menthol cigarettes completely, order them to be phased out, or not take action.

Roughly 12 million Americans smoke menthol cigarettes, including 75 percent of African American smokers. "We don't know what the public response would have been to banning a product so many people are addicted to. Do they switch to another product? Get it another way?" said Paul Billings of the American Lung Association.

"I am pessimistic that menthol will be banned," said Joel Nitzkin, chair of the American Association of Public Health Physicians Tobacco Control Task Force. Nitzkin opposed the FDA bill.

Lorillard, the leading menthol cigarette manufacturer, is concerned about a potential menthol ban. "We hope the FDA will solicit and consider input and comments from industry participants," said Lorillard spokesman Michael Robinson.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Allen on 19 Jun 09 08:27 AM EDT
Big tobacco is always way ahead of the game, at least two years ago RJR introduced a series of flavored cigarettes with "flavor pellets" in the filter. The lastest "camel crush" has a menthol pellet that can be broken to change the taste to a menthol. You gotta admire them for their crafty ways. They must be thinking the FDA could ban the flavoring of the tobacco, but perhaps not control the filter.

Posted by maxwood on 19 Jun 09 04:32 PM EDT
A further option for the FDA is not to ban anybody's thing, but rather encourage the use of vaporizer, e-cigarette and single-toke one-hitters with all herb smoking including both tobacco and peppermint (not to mention spearmint, pennyroyal, catmint etc.). Over 90% of the smoking public (454 million USA, 1.2 billion worldwide) inhales from hot burning overdose cigarettes, usually 700-mg. or bigger, mostly without even knowing you can use a mini-utensil to serve a 25-mg. serving each time you want a smoke. The industry profit margin depends on keeping victims ignorant of their dose-downsizing options so they go on lighting up the 700-mg. each time. Duh? What the FDA can do is (1) require the weight (usually 700-mg) be listed on the side of each cigarette; (2) require license tobacco vendors to advertise and offer for sale vaporizers, e-cigarettes and/or one-hitters; (3) offer for sale cannisters of sifted herbs ready for smoking, including various tobaccoes, peppermint, oregano, eucalyptus and maybe a few dozen others on a Required List, thus providing access to peppermint etc. without buying a tobacco overdose along with it.

Posted by Robert Starrett on 22 Jun 09 06:18 PM EDT
Who really cares....tobacco is legal...why are we then stepping on the rights of the people who chose to smoke and if it is so bad why doesn't the government make it illegal ... answer The BIG Government gets more money from smokers then the tobacco company....who else will pay for all those government programs. I think it is horrible that it is viewed as okay to ban markets and people from utilizing their free rights...what's next ban old cars, laser printers, carbon, fatty foods, soda, old people so younger people can have more medical rights, free thinking....if any of the above seems outrageous remember it starts small then eventually they are telling you How to eat, how to live, how to think and how to listen. I myself smoke Cherry Djarums, why because I like the smoothness of it, I choose to smoke I know the dangers and yet I choose to smoke. If I want to quite I will but not because the government says so. We have a lot of options to smoking out there, hell if the vaporizer cigs came in cherry I would use those instead, but once again I don't want the government to say I have to....give me the RIGHT to choose.

Posted by Gilbert Silva on 29 Jun 09 07:13 AM EDT
Personally i believe this be outrageous. I back the above comment 100%. Yes the government is the government an dis entitled to some power, but not the power to overthrow our right to smoke if we so choose. It is our life and health. The president himself does not have the right to control the choice of the people. If "we" want to smoke than let us. I also believe that this is one small step towards controlling our every move. All it takes is a foot in the door and before we know it options and choice are gone. As if cigarettes are the U.S's number one concern. What happened to terrorism, war, famine, poverty, and oppression. The economy is horrible and all the government can muster is to remove tobacco products. This is for lack of a better word RETARDED.

Posted by Mitchell Thibodeau on 29 Jun 09 11:11 AM EDT
Good lord, who said anybody was taking your sweet cigarettes away? Regulation and prohibition are two very different things. And, truely, I feel this could bring us one step closer to the end of our brainless marijuana prohibition which would be a huge stimulus for our little world here creating new jobs and generating business. But of course, be scared of the boogey man coming to stop you from smoking. It's 1984, isn't it?

Posted by J. H. on 11 Sep 09 08:40 PM EDT
This regulation IS prohibition. The demoncrats took away my clove cigarettes. This is becoming EXACTLY like 1984. Have you even read the book??

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines