Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

U.S. Supreme Court to Review School Strip-Search Case
January 21, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide whether allowing schools to conduct strip-searches is a reasonable way to prevent drug use in schools; the court is reviewing a case where a school official ordered a strip-search of a middle-school student to see if she was carrying prescription-strength ibuprofen, the Los Angeles Times reported Jan. 17.

While students are protected against "unreasonable searches," school officials are allowed to search students and their property if they have reason to believe that students possess drugs or are breaking school rules.

However, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld 13-year-old Savana Redding's right to sue her school's assistant principal for ordering a strip search, and the Safford Unified School District for violating Redding's constitutional rights.

The court said the full-body search was unreasonable, and found the assistant principal was liable for "a grossly intrusive search of a middle-school girl to locate pills with the potency of two over-the-counter Advil capsules."

The school district appealed the case to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the ruling would "create enormous confusion for school officials in trying to determine when and how searches may now properly be conducted." School officials asserted that judges do not understand the "shifting trends in drug abuse," and should leave such judgment calls to school officials.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Susan on 22 Jan 09 09:07 AM EST
This is offensive on so many levels. As a parent of a middle school child and as a prevention professional I am shocked and frightened that there is even the remotest possibility of this occurring in our schools. The rates of drug use by young people are down - not because of police state tactics, but because of education, life skill building and appropriate limit setting by adults. Hopefully the Supreme Court will rule against this school.

Posted by Lori on 22 Jan 09 11:37 AM EST
I can't believe that a middle school child was forced to be strip searched! A parent should have been called and nothing done until present! As far as I'm concerned, this should be an assualt case! What in the world were they thinking???

Posted by Frank Winkler on 22 Jan 09 01:57 PM EST
Concur that this case offends at the deepest level, but it none the less highlights a broader issue that has yet to be clearly resolved. Is it permissible, for example, as a deterent or otherwise, to use police (or private security contract)dogs to patrol and sniff student lockers to seek out hidden substances? If so, does that apply equally to positioning such dogs (or perhaps other electronic sniffers- should they one day become available) at the magnetometer pass-thrus at school entrances-- for school, basket ball games, etc? What about checking automobiles of students (and faculty, for that matter) with dogs at the school parking lots? When it concerns protecting the public at large, especially youth at public facilities, where do we draw the line between maintaining our inherent corporate responsibility (insert here also liability) to provide "reasonable measures" for the safety for the public, versus individual privacy? If this applies to drugs, does it apply as well to weapons? Unfortunately, our society today too often mandates such policies and procedures- in schools and otherwise, e.g., airports, conferences attended by various VIPs, etc. What say you?

Posted by Brinna on 22 Jan 09 05:19 PM EST
Can you say: Police State?

Posted by Anonymous on 22 Jan 09 07:09 PM EST
Unintended(?) consequence: because these searches find cannabis more easily than any and all really dangerous drugs, they steer youngsters toward the latter.

Posted by Hugh Poppell on 23 Jan 09 07:09 AM EST
I cannot agree more in regards to this issue being a case of assault.How will this girl now view authority figures .

Posted by Jason on 26 Jan 09 11:59 AM EST
I don't agree with the assistant principal's decision but in his defense, the girl was asked by a nurse in a nurse's station to strip to her underwear. And, if 13 year old girls are using prescription or over the counter medication for non-medical purposes, then they're going to have much worse problems in the future than embarrassment in front of a nurse.

Posted by Erika on 30 Jan 09 12:24 PM EST
Give me a break! Prescription strength ibuprofen is often used for severe cramps (and 13 year old gilrs can get them, just as easily as 30 year old women). It is not a medication that kids use to get high from (and if they do, they would achieve the same purpose with 3 OTC Advil). The use of a strip search was blatantly extreme and I agree with Brinna: Can we say Police State?

Posted by Jim Chambers on 17 Feb 09 09:10 AM EST
I'm not surprised at this. America is going to have to stop its relentless drive to use drugs as a way to control its people. The facts are that we lost the drug war a long time ago and the cost to enforce it now, in light of the current economic conditions is ridiculous. Mexico is the next economic mess to hit us with the drug cartels firmly in control. The #1 city for kidnappings in the world is Mexico City. Second is Phoenix, Arizona followed by more American cities. The issue has crossed the border and now faces us. Legalize drugs and remove the threat because 95% of all street trade in drugs is controlled by the Mexican Mafia. Better wake up America! Besides, let me smoke my pot in peace, brother/sister. If you don't like that solution, then stick with what hasn't worked and pay through the nose at tax time. Peace and out! Jimi...

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines