Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

U.S. House Committee Passes Cocaine Sentencing Equalization Bill
August 2, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A bill that would eliminate mandatory five-year federal sentences for minor crack-cocaine possession and remove other sentencing distinctions between the rock and powdered form of the drug has been approved by the House Judiciary Committee, the Hampton Roads Pilot reported July 30.

Sponsored by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), the Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act (HR-3245) bumps the five-year mandatory sentence to possession of a minimum of 500 grams of crack or powdered cocaine; previously, the penalty applied to possession of as little as 5 grams of crack.

The measure was approved in committee by a 16-9 margin and now moves to the full House for a vote.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by John French on 03 Aug 09 09:59 AM EDT
Next on the agenda should be the School Zone laws, which are highly discriminatory against inner city dwellers, the vast majority of whom live, work, and use their drugs within 1,000 feet of one school or the other.

Posted by Roberto on 03 Aug 09 11:32 AM EDT
It's about time. These crack laws contributed to the racial disparity in prisoner ratios. The new Bill will help reduce the effects of de-facto discrimination, but it is only a chip in the iceberg. I agree with John French, the next change will have to be in the School Zone laws. We need to keep our schools safe, but there are other ways of doing it without oppressing a whole community.

Posted by stopthehate on 03 Aug 09 02:17 PM EDT
I have to wonder what is wrong with the 9 on the committee who voted to keep this racist sentencing in place. Probably the same people who quote the higher number of blacks in prison to feel superior - you're not - the law is unfair!

Posted by Anthony Taurus on 04 Aug 09 08:22 PM EDT
It's a fact these laws were put into place to directly affect African Americans and Latinos. That's not even to be argued, in my opinion. My issue is why is it just in cocaine or sentencing. To me, this law isn't necessary because the original should have simply been repealed completely as it is unconstitutional in itself. If they want to make a real statement, consider EQUAL prosecution/sentencing in all laws. The rich can't swing their big "influence" in front of lawyers' hungry mouths. Whites won't get off with a slap on the wrist while Blacks and Hispanics get years. I still find it funny when it applied to Blacks and Hispanics, the sentencing was severe, to the point that it would destroy a man's life. But, in equalizing the sentencing, they chose to go easy. I guess there's a difference between White treatment and Black treatment. Race shouldn't be a consideration at all but in this law, it still is a factor.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines