Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

U.S. Changes Drug Policy in Afghanistan
July 7, 2009

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Richard C.  Holbrooke, the Obama administration's special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, recently told reporters at a meeting of G8 foreign ministers that the U.S. would be fundamentally changing its drug policy in Afghanistan, the New York Times reported June 28.

Instead of trying to eradicate opium poppy fields, as the Bush administration had done, greater emphasis will be put on assisting Afghan farmers to make a living through alternate crops and on seizing drugs leaving the country, as well as preventing supplies for growing and processing from entering, according to Holbrooke.

Holbrooke said the eradication policy, which has cost hundreds of millions of dollars, failed because it had put farmers out of work, alienating the Afghan people and driving them into the arms of the Taliban.

However General Khodaidad, the Afghan minister of counternarcotics, warned that if the strategy was not in accord with Afghan culture and tradition, any changes would be ineffective.

Foreign ministers at the G8 meeting gave their approval to the change in U.S. policy, and Antonio Maria Costa, the head of the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime, called the earlier eradication efforts "a sad joke."

Vanda Felbab-Brown, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, welcomed the change in policy but warned that because the Afghan economy is so dependent on the drug trade, the new policy was unlikely to significantly reduce the country's dependence on that trade.

Afghanistan supplies over 90 percent of the world's heroin, and the United Nations estimates that the Taliban make as much as $300 million from the opium trade annually.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Donna Miller on 07 Jul 09 11:46 AM EDT
Relook at which countries are LEGALLY supplying the morphonic derivative like India that has a thriving Big Pharma trade~and let Afghanistan 'SHARE in the wealth.' Economic development will assist this country along with water rights and healthy living standards to feed their people.

Posted by Diane Kopperman on 07 Jul 09 12:50 PM EDT
I agree that there are legal avenues for opiate production that should be provided. However, the current process of production is highly exploitive of farmers, with the Taliban reaping all of the profits. It will not be interested in the least in the legal drug trade because it is not lucrative enough. The opium trade was nearly eliminated during previous (religious) regimes, so it is possible. However, the Afghan general is correct, if the new strategies aren't in keeping with local customs, it will fail. We should be helping local farmers produce subsistance crops that grow in dry, mountainous, and rocky areas. Are there any? Would it provide enough income for the average citizen to prosper? What would the citizens like to do instead?

Posted by woods on 08 Jul 09 02:26 PM EDT
I am a Cooperative Extension County Agriculture Agent. I voluntered but for external reason did not have the opertunity to complete for a project to teach alternative agriculture crops in Afghanistan. My understanding based on conversation with those involved is that the farmers are willing but it is pure econmic to them. Unless a program which will compensate them for the difference in cost/return benfits for alternative crops it is a difficult situation. Also they and their families are threaten by the transporter and sellers (Tailaban, and other extreamist including the Russian mob) if they do not supply the raw materal.

Posted by Anonymous on 08 Jul 09 05:47 PM EDT
Neither Holbrooke nor Costa is expecting this suggestion, but why not legalize cannabis and send advisors to show Afghans how to load refined THC into e-cigarette cartridges? It might totally collapse the heroin (and cocaine) market. The sticking point is that Big 2Wackgo might be doomed also, with Pharma and alcohol not far behind.

Posted by jed on 26 Oct 09 01:03 PM EDT
Doesn't anyone remember that this exact same strategy failed in South America with coca? The cocaine trade is flourishing although use in the US seems to have given some ground to heroin.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments