Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Under Pressure, El Paso Lawmakers Drop Legalization Study Call
January 15, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The city council in El Paso, Texas last week unanimously called for a debate on drug legalization in the face of rising border violence, but backed off its resolution after a mayoral veto and pressure from federal and state lawmakers.

The Houston Chronicle reported Jan. 13 that the El Paso City Council voted 8-0 in favor of a resolution calling for the federal government to engage in an "open, honest, national dialogue on ending the prohibition of narcotics." The resolution was part of the city's response to the escalating drug-related violence in neighboring Cuidad Juarez, Mexico.

However, El Paso Mayor John Cook vetoed the resolution, and this week the city council voted 4-4 to uphold the veto. Some council members said they changed their vote because of fears that the legalization language could imperil federal funding for the city.

Those fears were stoked by a letter to the council by five Democratic state representatives, who said the resolution "does not bring the right attention to El Paso. It says 'we give up and we don't care.'"

Separately, U.S. Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas) called on the council to uphold the veto. "While this resolution is well-intentioned, I believe its passage would be counterproductive to our efforts to enact an ambitious legislative agenda at the federal level," wrote Reyes.

The letters served to chill debate on the issue, El Paso council members said.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Dave on 16 Jan 09 08:52 AM EST
Imagine being able to buy cocaine or heroin at the mall. Or being able to choose between widely advertised brands of marijuana touted in national magazines by good looking models. Legalization would undoubtedly end the violence on the border. But that open warfare would be replaced with the more subtle violence of the merchants of death who use the greed of many in this current system to make sure that people become and stay addicted to alcohol and tobacco. Perhaps we will make some progress when our cultural norms shift towards communitarian ideals that seek the best possible future for every single human being in place of the current norms of narcism and power over others.

Posted by Rachel VCL on 16 Jan 09 02:29 PM EST
The term "legalization" is often misinterpreted in simplistic views such as the previous poster, as if "legalizing" would obviously mean cocaine would be available "at the mall." There has to be a better way than the current method of bolstering a black market and selective legal enforcement on particular classes of people. With an open, honest debate or discussion, we could envision ways to stifle a black market through strict regulatory methods and medicalization, for example. But we can never find solutions if we are not allowed to have a discussion in the first place.

Posted by Jason Blanchette on 16 Jan 09 04:24 PM EST
Dear Rachel VCL: The discussion has been going on for decades. Go to a University library and read the research.

Posted by gene on 16 Jan 09 04:28 PM EST
What better way to reduce the use of substances by making them legal and placing them under the bureaucracy of the fedral government.

Posted by maxwood on 16 Jan 09 04:47 PM EST
Please debate this proposition: legalizing cannabis (and cannabis ONLY) will destroy the demand for cocaine and heroine (putting the gangsters out of business) AND tobacco (which is who really controls government policy, through the tax/bribe and intense lobbying).

Posted by legalize the ganja!!! on 07 Mar 09 03:27 AM EST
okay, first, i want to say, yes i am a stoner, but, the fact is that aside from the benefits of medicinal use of marijuana, its not only less harmful than alcohol and tobacco, it is nothing more than a plant....that grows....by itself.I dont understand how you can make a plant illegal in the first place, based on the fact that it alters ones state of mind, in most cases for better than worse, when they fed sodiers mk ultra....thats all im sayin?

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines