Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

U.N. Drug Strategy Criticized
March 12, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Drug-policy reform organizations are slamming the United Nations for moving to renew its commitment to a global anti-drug strategy they say has been a failure, Reuters reported March 10.

A new drug-strategy declaration from the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) is expected to be signed this week, but critics say the document perpetuates an approach that expands organized crime and spreads HIV. In 1998, the agency set the goal of a "drug-free world" and has worked to eradicate illicit narcotics, largely through law enforcement.

Drug-policy reformers say that harm reduction should be part of the strategy.

"The war on drugs has failed, but they're going to commit themselves to it again," said Genevieve Horwood of the International Drug Policy Consortium.

"Even though there are member states who disagree with the declaration, it will be signed because there's no other strategy they can all agree on."

UNODC director Antonio Maria Costa acknowledged the failings of the previous plan but said the problem is not one of strategy but implementation. "The crime and corruption associated with the drug trade are providing strong evidence to a vocal minority of pro-drug lobbyists to argue that the cure is worse than the disease," he said. "This would be an historical mistake, one which United Nations member states are not willing to make ... Because drug trafficking enriches criminals, destroys communities and even threatens nations, it has to be dealt with urgently and forcefully. Policy change is required against crime, not in favor of drugs."

Some European and Latin American nations have called for harm-reduction strategies in the plan, but the U.S., India, Russia and China -- which support the current approach -- have apparently prevailed.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Pat on 16 Mar 09 09:21 AM EDT
There must be a better strategy if they would just take the necessary time to research or spend time discussing various alternatives to the one that has been in practice. Harsher penalties for the ones providing drugs and treatment as opposed to incarceration for the addicted would be my recommendation.

Posted by Roger Morris on 16 Mar 09 02:57 PM EDT
Substantial rewards should be given for confiscation of large amounts of illicit drugs or for information on financial methods and people using money laundering of drug money. This would give people on the periphery the ability to make a profit from doing well.

Posted by stopthehate on 17 Mar 09 10:22 AM EDT
Experts in the field know that the "War on Drugs" is a failed policy. No effort seems to be made to educate the people stuck in the "soft on drugs" stance taken against anyone who opposes it. As they as they cling to this fallacy and no intervention is done to correct this misinformation, we will all suffer from a policy based on lies.

Posted by Liberty on 19 Mar 09 04:43 PM EDT
So long as the populace is kept uneducated and fearful of drugs, of simple inanimate chemicals, those in power have the opportunity to increase their power. All they have to do is say a catch-phrase like "drug-dealer" or "terrorist" and we've got a populace ready to throw money at the problem, vote anybody with a hard enough stance on the problem into office, and forgo their own civil rights so that the perpetrators may be brought to justice. The War on Drugs isn't a failed policy. Its purpose is not to eradicate drugs. It's to keep the lower classes down, to enforce the status quo, to create an SS-like force of police that can operate on loose rumors, and simply plant a baggie to put away political dissidents. Ideally, anyway.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines