Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

UN Agency Warns on Marijuana, Prescription Drugs
February 24, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The International Narcotics Control Board's (INCB) annual report includes a warning against potent pot and calls for greater controls on Internet pharmacies, but also says that opiate-based painkillers need to be made more available globally.

AFP reported Feb. 18 that the U.N. agency called for countries to review their policies regarding marijuana.

"Over the years, cannabis has become more potent and is associated with an increasing number of emergency-room admissions," the report said. "In spite of all these facts, the use of cannabis is often trivialized and, in some countries, controls over the cultivation, possession and use of cannabis are less strict than for other drugs."

INCB said laws in some countries allowing medical and recreational use of marijuana were "overlapping and confusing."

Internet pharmacies also were seen as a mixed blessing by INCB. "Purchasing pharmaceuticals online can be beneficial, especially in areas where hospitals and pharmaceutical services are widely dispersed," the report said, but the INCB "is alarmed that 'rogue' pharmacies are encouraging drug abuse among vulnerable groups."

Despite the growing problem of prescription-drug abuse in countries like the U.S., however, the report called for wider availability of powerful opiate-based painkillers.

"Although the access to controlled medicines, including morphine and codeine, is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a human right, it is virtually nonexistent in over 150 countries," the report said. "The WHO estimates that at least 30 million patients and possibly as many as 86 million annually suffer from untreated moderate to severe pain." 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by denise on 25 Feb 09 08:45 AM EST
it is barbaric, how this nation has handled drug abuse. the loathing the medical field has taken to drug addicts is not helping the situation. They lock up addicts rather then treat them. i know there has to be a better answer.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 25 Feb 09 09:17 AM EST
The thread-bare canard about "more potent pot" has been disputed so many times that it is embarrassing for our profession to keep repeating it. The European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), cognizant of the widely echoed claims that marijuana potency has gone through the roof in the past two or three decades, decided to take their own look. Their conclusion: "The available data do not show any long-term marked upward trend in the potency of herbal cannabis or cannabis resin imported into Europe," EMCDDA concluded. "Today's report shows that effective potency of cannabis in nearly all EU countries has remained quite stable for many years, at around 6–8% THC." For links to this and other studies debunking the "more potent pot" propaganda, email me at tracevu@bellsouth.net . Enough already.

Posted by Larry on 25 Feb 09 09:44 AM EST
Somebody has to challenge this report. "86 million people with untreated moderate or severe pain". That is the exact rhetoric the drug companies used domestically to help create tens of thousands of addicts from the "legal" drugs and thousands of deaths. We need more distribution of deadly and addictive drugs? Possibly "proper distribution", but "more". The insanity of the rhetoric continues from the special interests. The Narcotics Control Board should be questioned on this report to its authenticity and sincerity.

Posted by Jason Blanchette on 25 Feb 09 09:48 AM EST
Bernie: You are not in the same profession as most people who read these articles. You are an advocate for marijuana policy reform. The MPP uses your story of being prosecuted for growing "medical marijuana" to promote their cause, which is to eventually make recreational marijuana legal.

Posted by Meredith Currie on 25 Feb 09 10:39 AM EST
We have demonized tobacco use, but consistently send a message that marijuana is no big deal. For the life of me I can not make sense of that. Whether marijuana use has become more potent or not it obviously does not help most of the adolescents I work with daily. It simply delays them from becoming independent and self-sufficient adults. Let's stop living in denial that marijuana is the miracle drug, because it simply is not.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 25 Feb 09 11:36 AM EST
Denise your statement just isn't true. Any drug addict in this country has had many chances for drug treatment before they do any time in jail. I have worked in the AOD treatment field for 20 years in San Diego where we have been using alternitive sentencing for more than 20 years, way before Prop 36 in California. I can't count how many times I did a screening for a detox program ware the cliant said I have to get in today or I will go to jail, but the court had given them 3 months to find a placement and they waited to the last day to sign-up and of course they went to jail for not compling with a court order. Addicts need consequences or there is no change.

Posted by Frank Winkler on 25 Feb 09 12:23 PM EST
Re Bernie Ellis comments question more potent pot-- just take a moment to leaf through a copy of High Times to see just how potent pot is today. Ever heard of or seen marijuana growing in the wold that emits pure crystalline THC in maturity? Not enough? Read the assessments of various grades and strains of high grade pot developed via hybridization, hydroponics, etc. Check also the ads for high grade seeds. Then try to convince me once again that pot is still the same as 20 years ago.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 25 Feb 09 01:15 PM EST
Jason, I emailed you a link to my 12 page resume, but I see you have not responded (nor sent me your own resume, as I requested.) I have spent over 30 years establishing model programs to reduce substance abuse at the tribal, state and federal levels. My work has been selected as models for effective substance abuse reduction by CDC, CSAT, NIH, the World Health Organization, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the US Department of Justice, among others. That recognition allowed me to be selected as a Congressional advisor on substance abuse under both Bush I and Clinton. So when I speak about my "profession" (as a public health epidemiologist, community mobilizer and the founder and director of the largest substane abuse treatment program in Wyoming), I am describing myself accurately. Unfortunately, my involvement in the medical marijuana issue (as a convicted provider to four terminally ill patients) seems to trump the rest of my life's work. Welcome to my world (and I'm still waiting to know which world-view you speak from.)

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 25 Feb 09 01:28 PM EST
Frank, I posted my email address above so people could request links to the debunked "more potent pot" propaganda. The debunking research has been done in the US as well as in Europe. Here's a key quote from Mahmoud A. ElSohly, PhD, Research Professor at the Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of Mississippi: "Since 1992, the potency of confiscated marijuana samples has continuously risen, going from 3.1% in 1992 to 4.2% in 1997. The average concentration of D9-THC in all cannabis samples showed a gradual rise from 3% in 1991 to 4.47% in 1997. Hashish and hash oil, on the other hand, showed no specific potency trends. Other major cannabinoids showed no significant change in their concentration over the years." For those drug warriors here who can't do the math, that's a 50% increase, not a 1,000% increase. Even if we now equal European pot potency, the increase would still be only slightly more than double where we were almost twenty years ago. Once again, anyone here is welcome to email me if you want the links.

Posted by Dwayne Polidori on 25 Feb 09 02:18 PM EST
Bernie I under stand what your saying!and your not the only one out there that stands for marijuana reform and recreational use hell if alcohol is legal than why isn't marijuana? More power to ya

Posted by howlandwoof on 25 Feb 09 02:54 PM EST
I'm also in the treatment field, and have been for quite some time. I believe that the research may not be completely correct, as far as including all the information available today. There have been some who claim that Maine has the most potent hydoponically-grown cannabis on the planet, with a Delta 9 THC content as high as 19 -19.5%. There may be some boasting there on the part of the growers, but, back in my day, I remember seeing the potency increase. David Ohlms has reported in some of his [and others'] research that the content has gotten pretty high, so placing the content at 4 1/2% might be because the weed tested was the highest that research facility could acquire at that time. Let's also not forget that many of the legal research projects for cannabis require the use of government-grown weed, which has a Delta 9 THC content of about 2-3%. If that is the case, testing Maine's "hydro" might actually produce some pretty prodigious results.

Posted by Karen Ventimiglia on 25 Feb 09 03:03 PM EST
Before trying to disperse narcotics to other countries you should do a study on how much of a drug problem they have without them. I agree that people in pain should be treated appropriately but narcotics have harmed more lives then the ones they have helped. We have a whole new generation of Heroin addicts in this country thanks to the easy availabilty to these narcotics...

Posted by Bill Godshall on 25 Feb 09 03:36 PM EST
Meredith wrote: "We have demonized tobacco use, but consistently send a message that marijuana is no big deal." In contrast to marijuana users, tobacco users aren't being fired, arrested, convicted, imprisoned, cajoled into abstinence only treatment, and made unemployable. Besides, according to US government agencies, cigarettes are more addictive than heroin or cocaine, and cigarettes kill 440,000 Americans annually compared to no known deaths from marijuana use.

Posted by Bill Godshall on 25 Feb 09 03:50 PM EST
John from Oceanside wrote: "Any drug addict in this country has had many chances for drug treatment before they do any time in jail." None of the 45 million cigarette addicts or even more caffiene addicts in the US that are treated this way. Would John similarly imprison all cigarette and caffiene addicts if they didn't graduate from his abstinence only program? Seems like John is primarily interested in making money off the war on drugs.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 25 Feb 09 08:29 PM EST
In response to howlandwoof, the European and US labs I quoted earlier are both responsible for testing thousands of marijuana samples each year that are seized in DEA and other law enforcement raids. Thus, their results are not due to small or otehrwise biased samples. BTW, the highest THC content ever found by the Ole Miss lab since 1975 was 33%, in a single sample confiscated in Oregon. That single sample's highest level ever found is lower than John Walters suggested (in his potent pot propaganda) is the norm for most marijuana these days. I appreciate the people who have emailed me for the "potent pot debunked" references. I am also glad that Jason has read my resume and I anticipate he will have something to say here about my qualifications to participate in JTOnline discussions, now that he knows more than he did earlier today. A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing, but less dangerous (or insulting) than complete ignorance.

Posted by Tommy on 25 Feb 09 10:17 PM EST
Bernie Ellis talks about debunking the potent pot,and also refers to the 50% increase, as opposed to a 1,000% increase. Folks, ANY increase is an increase, and if you think a 50% increase in a chemical is trivial, then you are either naive, or a victim of a mind-altering drug yourself, no matter what your resume' says.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 26 Feb 09 06:54 AM EST
Tommy, a 50% increase over a twenty year period is 20 to 60 times less than the ONDCP says has happened with marijuana. These false messages continue to undermine our government's credibility on drug issues. I am not naive and I don't have to post anonymously here or anywhere else. In this particular debate, I have offered facts and references, not uninformed insults and hyperbole. Anyone here remains free to contact me for factual information from US and European government drug-testing labs. (Thanks to those who did.) As far as increased potency, Tommy, you might familiarize yourself with the terms "titration" and "tolerence". Both impact the use of more potent marijuana (or any other substances, for that matter.) Drinkers know they need less PGA than beer to achieve the desired effect. Marijuana users, be they medical or recreational, know the same thing. Why, after a seven decade failed drug prohibition policy, are drug warriors still ignorant about that? Upton Sinclair said it best: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 26 Feb 09 08:23 AM EST
I love reading your stuff Bernie. As Bernie just stated titrate I believe is to regulate your intake according to strength,just like any other drug only NO MATTER the potentcy of cannabis you can NEVER ingest enough to cause DEATH. Can anyone say that about any other drugs / substances used and abused to date? So instead of needing 5 puffs to get high you may only need 1 or 2 puffs of the more potent cannabis.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 26 Feb 09 01:12 PM EST
Dear Bill I have dedicated my life to helping addicts and preventing problems caused by alcohol and other drugs. I have worked for agencies that get county funds in San Diego. The reality of working in this system is that we are paid very little. I stated addicts have many chances for treatmemt before ending up in jail and we have been using alternitive sentancing for more than 20 years. Out of that statement how did you get I want everyone locked up. You might want to read comments two or three times.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 26 Feb 09 09:46 PM EST
As usual, I am astounded to see grown adults who have swallowed whole, and then regurgitate up the propaganda of the culture wars: i.e. Pot is so dangerous that we must jail people for using and selling it. How patently absurd. Can't you see the true rationale behind the INCB report. It is ALL about money. Money for Big Pharma. Money for the perpetrators of the unending international drug war. Of course adolescents shouldn't smoke cannabis, but neither should they watch 30 hours of TV each week, eat sugar-frosted cereal, drink empty-calorie soda pop, have unprotected sex, let alone drink liquor, smoke tobacco, and all the other crazy things teens will try out of ignorance or stupidity. As someone who traveled in India in the 60's, smoked plenty of hash (virtually pure THC, by the way) and then returned to the states to become valedictorian of my graduating class, and phi beta kappa; designated "inventor of the week" by MIT; founded my own business; established myself as an award winning fine artist and graphic designer and author, all I have to say is, any report that privileges opiates over cannabis is obviously and seriously skewed. You have to ask yourselves: why?

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 27 Feb 09 08:10 AM EST
I read an article recently that said there were 4 Big Pharm lobbyists per each member of congress. Thats an awful lot of potential palm greasing taking place ( I am in no way insinuating that we have shady politicians in Congress.) Yea right! I can just hear some of the behind closed door conversations, (it goes a little like this) lobbyist: "If you vote to keep cannabis illegal I will see that your campaign fund is amply rewarded, if you get my meaning." We the People know how some politicians operate. Big Pharm = Big $Money$, Need I say more?

Posted by Jason Blanchette on 28 Feb 09 11:50 PM EST
Bernie does have a resume posted on a website showing an extensive background in this field. I apologize to Bernie and to everyone else for making assumptions. Despite the respect he deserves for the work he's done, I have to say that I believe Bernie and myself to have entirely differing views that drive us to do what we do.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 01 Mar 09 09:16 AM EST
Thank you, Jason. Before my medical marijuana conviction, I enjoyed working to reduce serious substance abuse, starting with the most dangerous and addictive substance (tobacco) in the late 70s and 80s, proceeding to reducing alcohol abuse in Indian country and the Southwest, and ending with fighting the methamphetamine epidemic in Wyoming and elsewhere. However, after 6+ years of dances with (federal) wolves over medical marijuana, that work history sometimes seems to be for naught. To paraphrase Shakespeare, "The laws men break live after them. The good is oft interred with their bones." If that must continue to be, so let it be with me. However, AG Holder's announcement last week suspending DEA raids on medical marijuana programs suggests that the end of a senseless and science-baseless cannabis prohibition policy may be coming to an end. If I am among the last to lose my career, reputation and farm to the federal farces of evil, that would be fine with me. Jason, I hope you enjoy and learn from the links I sent you. As for the rest of us, if we never stop fighting (for science, common sense and compassion), we cannot lose.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 01 Mar 09 09:26 AM EST
It would be nice if JTO would allow for a preview or edit of our comments to correct mistakes, as is the practice elsewhere. To make myself clear, one sentence in the above post should have read: "However, AG Holder's announcement last week suspending DEA raids on medical marijuana programs suggests that the senseless and science-baseless cannabis prohibition policy may be coming to an end." Re: AG Holder's decision (which I do hope JTO will cover), it has completely changed the dynamic here in Tennessee for re-establishing our state's medical marijuana program, as I expect it will elsewhere also. It is amazingly refreshing to have returned intelligence and an understanding of public health, science and the Constitution to our federal executive branch. Not a minute too soon.

Posted by larry 78245 on 02 Mar 09 12:25 PM EST
To BERNIE ELLIS. Your an advocate for What! You mean legalization of pot. Im a recovering Addict/Alcoholic I've seen/heard first hand(myself Included) how pot leads to other drugs. Im not impressed w/your being a Congressional advisor. You need to attend some N/A,A/A meeting and listen. Im not inpressed with you at all. E-mail me resume ljq2006.1225@yahoo.com

Posted by Eric Wood on 02 Mar 09 12:45 PM EST
Here we go again, getting caught up in semantics and supposedly conflicting research. Jim Valvano reminded us before his death that people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp-post -- for support not illumination. Marijuana proponents are the most adept of any drug culture at creating diversions and counter arguments in an attempt to support their subversive crusade. Marijuana Policy Project says in their own literature that they have championed the medicinal marijuana movement only to get a foot in the door of overall legalization. Let's just get the conversation back to where it needs to be: Marijuana is not medicine, it is not 'just' an herb, it is not a gateway. It is an insidious DRUG with numerous impairment and health consequences and should be treated as such. Period.

Posted by Paula D. Gordon on 02 Mar 09 01:23 PM EST
For decades, an extensive scientific literature has been amassing on the mental, psychological, social health, and physical effects of marijuana. It can be a challenge to access and begin to assimilate the findings. For instance, Harris Isbell's research in Psychopharmaologia in 1967 showed that delta 9 THC could have idiosyncratic psychotomimetic effects in human subjects. Flashback and contact high effects familiar to users have been researched. The physical effects of marijuana have been extensively researched including connections to lung cancer and testicular cancer. The effects of passive inhalation has been researched. References to such research and several publications and papers have just been made freely available online, including an extensive paper on passive inhalation of marijuana smoke and tobacco smoke. See http://groups.google.com/group/GordonDrugAbusePrevention/ along with a refereed journal article entitled "Toward the Resolution of the Controversy Surrounding the Effects and Social Health Implications of Marijuana Use." If you are not able to access this material online, I would be happy to send it to you free of charge on request to pgordon@erols.com.

Posted by George on 02 Mar 09 01:34 PM EST
"Bernie does have a resume posted on a website showing an extensive background in this field. I apologize to Bernie and to everyone else for making assumptions."- My curiosity peeked, I check out his website, and his vitae. Post "quicktake", I found the vitae wasn't of traditional format. Bernie, although I'm sure you're tired of defending yourself, would you mind explaining what your contribution to research generally is? Have you AUTHORED articles in peer-reviewed journals, or articles published by the federally funded centers or institutes you mentioned working with. Maybe this was on the vitae, and I just didn't notice due to format. Peer reviewed journal articles are usually in a section by themselves. Usually to be considered an expert in a field, one needs a Ph.d., which I didn't notice on the vitae. Mastering statistical methods and contributing these to researchers wouldn't justify the perceived tone of condescension in Bernie's posts (what would?). Bernie, where might we go to corroborate your account of your contribution to the substance abuse/addiction community?

Posted by Michael Kelley on 02 Mar 09 01:46 PM EST
One of the very important benefits of the change in DEA policy on medical marijuana is that state-certified patients in the USA can now be systematically studied by scientists with longitudinal designs without having to worry about having knowledge of research participants committing a federal crime. With more research having fewer confounding variables, better policies (both in the USA and internationally) can be objectively formulated based up actual evidence, rather than simply conjecture, opinion, or other beliefs. Michael Kelley, D.Phil. associate professor of psychology at Hawai'i Pacific University, board member of the Drug Policy Forum of Hawai'i, and former research fellow of NIDA and NIAAA

Posted by Michael Kelley on 02 Mar 09 02:42 PM EST
Concerning the quotation that "Over the years, cannabis has become more potent and is associated with an increasing number of emergency-room admissions," I looked at the UN report and was surprised by the marijuana data (Table 12). But upon looking at their methodology (although they are very vague on the fine details criteria to count cases) it would appear that any hospital admission where use of drugs was recorded in charts was then counted as “associated with.” Thus the report apparently does not tell us if a patient came to the hospital for a problem directly related to marijuana use.

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 03 Mar 09 11:53 AM EST
VERY WELL STATED Dr. Mr. Kelley. I in NO WAY advocate using / abusing drugs especially if you have never used before, I say the exact opposite. What I am saying is lets not continue making criminals of the people who have already chosen to use and continue to use. If a crime is committed while using / abusing drugs then treat that person as a person who has committed a crime and let his / her peers decide their fate.

Posted by Paula D. Gordon on 03 Mar 09 03:47 PM EST
If you wish updated references to the literature beyond what can be found in the articles about the effects of marijuana on my website at http://groups.google.com/group/GordonDrugAbusePrevention/, many can be found in Dr. Stuart Reece entitled “Cutting The Gordian Knot of Drug Addiction Confusion Strategy of Seduction vs. Seduction of Strategy”, The Journal of Global Drug Policy and Practice VOLUME 2, ISSUE 4 - WINTER 2009 at http://www.globaldrugpolicy.org/2/4/2.php . With regard to the policies that are needed, I believe that there should be a continuing and growing emphasis on effective diversion (including drug court programs) and early intervention for youth (with judicial backup but no record if successful re-education and treatment)and that this should go on hand in hand with a massive prevention-education effort that helps dissuade youth and adults from using a substance that has such negative effects on mental, psychological, and social and physical health as well as on the overall well being of society.

Posted by Eric Helmuth, Join Together on 03 Mar 09 04:11 PM EST
All: There has been some excellent discussion here, but please remember to keep it focused on ideas and not ad hominem attacks on people's motives.

Posted by bbgb on 06 Mar 09 08:49 PM EST
You na aa guys are ignorant. Don't you Know that LSD was recomended for meeting goers by Bill "W" They don't tell you that now do they, SHOVE YOUR MEETINGS (and your God) the gate swings both ways, enjoy your drug adventures, weed brings you in and out, and should be MANDATORY.

Posted by Paula D. Gordon on 06 Mar 09 10:21 PM EST
After the conclusions of the deliberations in Independence Hall, Benjamin Franklin was asked later by a woman what kind of a government the new nation had. He is said to have replied: “A republic Madame, if we can keep it.” As a long time former “Berkeleyite” in the sixties (or as some called it “Beserkely”,) I saw first hand the reality there and in San Francisco that Allen Ginsberg described in his poem “Howl”, the poem that began “I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness ….” The question is can we sanction the recreational, chronic, and/or experimental use of psychoactive drugs, including marijuana, and still keep our republic. I think not, since keeping our republic depends on an educated and informed citizenry capable of reasoning, good judgment, the exercise of common sense.

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 08 Mar 09 02:29 PM EDT
Paula, I have known a few people in my life that believe it or not ARE educated, well informed citizens capable of reasoning and can and do exercise good judgement, and common sense on a daily bases. We sit around when together and most of the conversations these days lead down the political trail, and all of the troubles the new administration is facing and failing at. These people use good judgement by choosing to recreate without alcohol and resent the fact that you and others believe just because a substance is illicit makes it any more dangerous than the FDA approved POISONS that BIG PHARMA produce and push on the public over the airways in advertisements. Remember the key word in your last sentence "OUR" republic.

Posted by Paula D. Gordon on 08 Mar 09 04:04 PM EDT
A quandry: If the use of a substance is affecting one's judgment, how is that person going to be able to make the assessment that one's judgment has been impaired? Parents, teachers, professors, psychotherapists, non using spouses and friends, and employers are among those who are perhaps most familiar with such changes in behavior. A committed user or unquestioning casual user might try an experiment: Cease all use for several months and see what changes there might be with regard to concentration, motivation, short term memory, and long term memory. Observe if there are flashback experiences in times of stress or great anxiety. Observe if there are contact high effects. For those persons, youth and adults, whom I have known over the years, including youth whom I have counseled, their behavior has changed and their cognitive capabilities have changed and changed for the better when they have stopped using marijuana. (Continued below)

Posted by Paula D. Gordon on 08 Mar 09 04:08 PM EDT
(Continuation of previous posting) Flashbacks and contact highs also appear to diminish with the passage of time after use is stopped. Such behavioral changes and effects and some physiological reasons for the lingering effects are discussed in my article and my paper that address the effects of marijuana (with extensive references to the scientific literature) at http://groups.google.com/group/GordonDrugAbusePrevention. I will be happy to send anyone file copies if you are not able to access the files online. Requests may be sent to pgordon@erols.com .

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 09 Mar 09 09:18 AM EDT
I don't know who you have been counselling but apparently they have been doing more than smoking cannabis. I have been around lots of cannabis consumers and have never encountered people who have FLASHBACKS from using and even abusing cannabis.I have purposefully tried to get a contact high just by being in a smoke filled room, never happened. I have been around acid and used LSD in my lifetime and STILL have never encountered ANYONE who has or has known anyone to have had FLASHBACKS. I do know a guy who was messed up by his Nintendo but it had to do with seizures not flashbacks, so in my experiences Nintendo is more harmful and addictive than cannabis. Maybe if the economy gets worse and I lose my job I'll consider counselling Nintendo Addicts, First order of business would be to put down that control and get your as_ outside and enjoy MOTHER NATURE for awhile. I believe people whos livlihood lies in drug counselling, jailers, etc... just lump cannabis in with all their other substances just as a way of maintaining their jobs because cannabis consumers out number any others. Without illicit drugs you all would be seeking new employment.

Posted by Paula D. Gordon on 10 Mar 09 04:39 PM EDT
From a book review by a psychiatrist,E.S.Dummit, "who treats adolescents with substance dependence disorders". (The book was on the effects of drug use.): "(T)he author glosses over the very real and known physical and mental health risks associated with heavy chronic marijuana smoking..His perspective is that of scientist concerned with the effects of THC, rather than mine, as a physician concerned with the mental and physical health of children who seek my help..It concerns me that (the author) has left a very vital branch of biomedical science out of his review, namely, the epidemiology, comorbidity, and health consequences of cannabis abuse and dependence. While it is true that most people who smoke pot occasionally are probably not going to become addicted or escalate use into more dangerous drugs, it remains the major 'gateway drug' by which adolescents are introduced into the addictive downward spiral that can destroy their lives, if they are one of the unfortunate who are biologically predisposed to addiction..(the author failed) "to review the science of cannabis dependence and the substantial scientific literature on the psychobiology of addictive behavior."

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 13 Mar 09 08:59 AM EDT
Paula: Maybe E.S. Dummit has glossed over what you determine as very real and known physical and mental health risks associated with chronic cannabis smoking for a reason. Not everyone holds your views on the effects and ill-effects of cannabis consumption.

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 14 Mar 09 09:14 AM EDT
Maybe the E.S. Dummit glosses over (what you say is) real, known physical and mental health risks associated with heavy chronic cannabis smoking for a good reason. Maybe this particular Psyciatrist knows something we don't.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 16 Mar 09 08:36 AM EDT
Boy, some of these JTO threads go on forever, and every time I check back, I find more ad hominem attacks against me. For someone named George (who I can't Google since I don't know what your name is), I did list my email address upthread so that folks like yourself could get in touch. Just for you, I'll post it again ( tracevu@bellsouth.net ). I am happy to send you my resume and bio sketch and to correspond with you off-thread. However, I would expect you to return the favor, something that another persistent drug worrier upthread never got around to doing. So again, George, whoever you are, email me and I'll send you a resume you might have less trouble reading. However, I've never had anyone else say they have difficulty reading the resume posted online. Must be a perceptual problem of some sort. (See HL Mencken and Upton Sinclair).

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 16 Mar 09 08:39 AM EDT
Boy, some of these JTO threads go on forever, and every time I check back, I find more ad hominem attacks against me. For someone named George (who I can't Google since I don't know what your name is), I did list my email address upthread so that folks like yourself could get in touch. Just for you, I'll post it again ( tracevu@bellsouth.net ). I am happy to send you my resume and bio sketch and to correspond with you off-thread. However, I would expect you to return the favor, something that another persistent drug worrier upthread never got around to doing. So again, George, whoever you are, email me and I'll send you a resume you might have less trouble reading. However, I've never had anyone else say they have difficulty reading the resume posted online. Must be a perceptual problem of some sort. (See HL Mencken and Upton Sinclair).

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 16 Mar 09 08:48 AM EDT
George (whoever you are): I posted my email address upthread for folks to get in touch with me. In case you missed it, here it is again: tracevu@bellsouth.net . You are the first person who has reported having difficulty reading my resume online, so there may be a perceptual problem. (See HL Mencken and Upton Sinclair).

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines