Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Tobacco Company to Test Effectiveness of 'Less Toxic' Cigarettes
June 8, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

British American Tobacco (BAT) is testing the effectiveness of new cigarettes that the company claims emit less-toxic smoke, The Financial Times reported May 9.

BAT's three prototype cigarettes include new filters and tobacco that has been treated with enzymes to help create less toxicants as they burn.

More than 200 volunteers are being recruited in Hamburg, Germany to use the experimental cigarettes. Subjects will undergo a series of scientific tests to measure their biological reactions to the prototype products, and to find out if and how much the cigarettes reduce their exposure to toxicants.

David O'Reilly, head of public health and scientific affairs at BAT, said the science is now available to make smoking safer.

The study's results are slated to be published in a scientific journal in 2010.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Michael S on 09 Jun 09 12:28 PM EDT
Make smoking safer? Hmmm, lets see...sucking fumes out of your car exhaust or sucking the air from atop your chimney?

Posted by maxwood on 09 Jun 09 09:30 PM EDT
They are trying to duck the main issue, which is that consumers can make their own smoking safer by downsizing the dose from 700-mg. (for most present-day cigarettes) to something like 25-mg., achieved in a single-toke one-hitter. A "safer cigarette" is moot, look at all the safer ways than a cigarette to get the nicotine an inhalant user wants, including vaporizer, electronic-cigarette, single-toke one-hitter, and for variety, nicotine gum, nicotine patch, Snus, etc. By banning or slandering any or all of the above the industry tries to survive a few more years extracting more money from mostly poor families and leaving a windfall of medical need for Big Pharma a few decades down the road.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines