Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Tobacco Allies' Alternative to FDA Bill Rejected
June 10, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A proposed substitute for the Senate's tobacco-regulation bill was rejected on a 60-36 vote, and the Senate is now poised to approve the landmark regulatory measure, the Associated Press reported June 10.

The alternative bill was offered by two tobacco-state lawmakers, Sens. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), who objected to giving the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority to regulate tobacco products. The legislators contended that FDA regulation would hurt development of safer alternatives to smoking as well as local tobacco farmers.

Instead, the Burr-Hagan bill would have created a Tobacco Harm Reduction Center in the Department of Health and Human Services. But Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), one of the sponsors of the FDA regulation bill, said the alternative had less regulatory power and didn't do enough to prevent tobacco marketing to children.  

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bill Godshall on 11 Jun 09 12:04 PM EDT
Shame on Join Together editors for choosing the biased and misleading title "Tobacco Allies' Alternative to FDA Bill Rejected". It would be far more appropriate and accurate for Join Together editors to refer to the Senate FDA tobacco legislation as "Philip Morris sponsored", since PM is the world's and nation's largest tobacco company that negotiated, drafted, agreed to and bankrolled its lobbying compaign. In contrast, the Burr/Hagan substitute would have informed smokers and the public about the comparable morbidity/martality risks of different tobacco products, allowed smokefree tobacco/nicotine (which are 99% less hazardous than cigarettes) to compete against cigarettes on the market, and wouldn't have duped the public into believing that FDA approved tobacco products are less hazardous than in the past. Join Together should be truthfully informing its readers, not backing a Philip Morris cigarette protection bill by referring to sound drug and public health policy proposals as sponsored by "tobacco allies".

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines