Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Survey Finds Support for Ignition Interlock Devices to Prevent DWI
October 8, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Two-thirds of Americans would support the installation of devices that prevent cars from starting if drivers are impaired -- assuming such technology is reliable -- according to a survey from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).

The survey also found that 40 percent of respondents said they would like such devices installed in their own cars if that option was available. Some drunk-driving prevention experts would like to see the so-called ignition-interlock devices installed on all vehicles. About 180,000 of the devices are currently installed in the U.S.

"The results are clear-cut and a bit surprising," said IIHS researcher Anne McCartt. "We didn't expect to find support across the board for the idea of detecting alcohol in everybody, but this survey tells us people are ready to crack down on all impaired drivers, not just those who've had DWI convictions."

McCartt said that while the current devices are "unwieldy and intrusive," versions that would be more appropriate for all drivers (not just those convicted of DWI offenses) are in the works.

The IIHS found that 84 percent of about 1,000 people surveyed supported the devices for convicted drunk drivers. Among nondrinkers, 74 percent said the devices should be installed in all cars, compared to 66 percent of weekly drinkers and 50 percent of respondents who said they drink alcohol four or more times weekly. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Chris on 09 Oct 09 09:39 AM EDT
I think it's a great idea. When I read the police blotter in my local paper, about half to three-fourths of all arrests are for DWI or DUI. It seems like it's just not that big a deal since it happens again and again and again. It's a big deal to me and it should be for our communties.

Posted by Sarah on 09 Oct 09 11:50 AM EDT
They first need to find a way where the interlock device cannot be circumvented allowing the person restricted from driving to start the vehicle. Filters CAN be used on the breathing apparatus, or the drinker can have someone without alcohol on his or her breath to breath into the device.

Posted by DD_838 on 09 Oct 09 12:03 PM EDT
Having to blow into a machine every time I start my car. I don't think so. I am a responsible adult who does not drink and drive. Why should I have to suffer by having to go through so much just to start my car?

Posted by Diane on 09 Oct 09 12:42 PM EDT
They weren't proposing inter-lock systems for EVERYBODY, just people convicted of DUII. Also, each machine is calibrated to a particular person so that another person cannot start the car for him (here).

Posted by Shattah206 on 12 Oct 09 06:50 PM EDT
Actually, this proposal is for EVERYBODY. It's a paradigm shift from punishment to prevention. If it is not tied to some computer somewhere that rats you out if you blow (+), there is no reason to circumvent. It just gives you some information: "you are over the legal limit" I think most drinkers woukld stop there and make other transportation arrangements. No, this sort of system would not stop determined drunks. No system will do that. It would keep marginal folks out of court, etc. and save them big $$ if they heed the IID.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines