Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Stimulus Package Has No Funds for Addiction Block Grant
January 30, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Report
by Bob Curley

The $819-billion economic stimulus plan recently approved by the House of Representatives included tax cuts, aid to states and a myriad of other spending from infrastructure improvement to job programs -- but not the direct funding for alcohol and other drug treatment or prevention that advocates had hoped for.

The National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors (NASADAD) and 150 other groups had written to the House and Senate budget committees asking for $100 million for the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant (SAPT) be included in the stimulus package. Citing the impact that block grant funds have on drug use, employment, crime, and housing, NASADAD argued that including the funding would be "a valuable way to foster economic growth and help those most in need of services."

However, that plea apparently fell on deaf ears in Congress. Neither the bill passed on a 244-188 vote in the House on Jan. 22, or the measure being considered in the Senate, included SAPT block-grant funding. In fact, according to NASADAD, neither bill even mentions substance abuse or the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

The Senate bill does include $75 million for smoking-cessation programs, however -- money that sponsor Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) said would help the economy by cutting smoking-related healthcare costs. And both bills include increases for the Department of Justice's Byrne Justice Assistance program -- $3 billion on the House measure and $1.5 billion for the Senate bill.

"Byrne grants help state and local governments to fund a broad range of law enforcement-related activities; among the allowable uses for Byrne funds are education, prevention and treatment services for drug addiction," noted Gabrielle de la Gueronniere, deputy director for national policy at the Legal Action Center. "A number of states use some of their Byrne grant funds for drug treatment and alternative-to-incarceration programming."

Also included was an increase in federal assistance for state Medicaid programs, and the Senate bill calls for an additional $400 million for the Social Services Block Grant "for States and local non-profits to deliver critical services to unemployed and low-income individuals struggling with the effects of the recession." No such provision was included in the House bill, however, according to a NASADAD analysis of the stimulus plans.

Both plans featured significant funding for general prevention and wellness programs -- $5.8 billion in the Senate bill and $3 billion in the House plan. The House measure, for example, said the goal is to prevent chronic diseases and thus lower healthcare costs. Health research and even health-related information technology funding is also part of the stimulus plan.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by budy920 on 02 Feb 09 09:49 AM EST
everyone in the treatment community needs to contact their senators and advocate to include a specific set aside for SA treatment - any additional money in the block grant for welfare and social service programs will never be used for SA treatment - it will be used to get jobs for clients regardless of their need for treatment -call/write now!!

Posted by Frank chovitz, MS, LADC on 02 Feb 09 11:15 AM EST
It was my understanding that President Obama was going to be more interested in the treatment of my patients, rather than to continue the senseless and costly incarceration, with little to no emphasis on treatment while incarcerated. This turn of events is very disheartening for me as I had hoped that for possibly the first time, our President could advocate for treatment of addiction, and identifying it, for the first time, as a disease. We on the front lines continue to be the advocates for our patients and the endless and uneducated stigma that works against them when they are fresh out of detox or residential, and experiencing Post Acute Withdrawal syndrome. something has to give, something has to change, in order to turn the tide of negativity and lack of support and understanding that my patient's face not only in their own homes, but as they apply for jobs and try to become productive members of society.

Posted by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis on 02 Feb 09 01:03 PM EST
I had such high hopes that this president would understand how desperately we need help for our addicted citizens. When are our representatives from the president on down, going to get it through their heads that we are losing our children at an alarming rate due to addiction! Please contact your representatives and demand that they do something about this. We can't continue to lose our future. Most drug addicts are good people with a bad disease!

Posted by Julian on 02 Feb 09 07:00 PM EST
This is an economic stimulus bill. The congress will have the next 4 years to work with the Obama administration on addressing these issues. Easy does It. One day at a time.First things first. Remember?

Posted by Rosemary on 02 Feb 09 07:21 PM EST
Julian, both myself and Mrs. McGinnis have had our children DIE due to drug overdoses. I think we have our priorities well in order, thank you very much! Education and treatment options for the uninsured and/or under-insured are desperately needed as soon as possible. Unfortunately, we get instead a president who admits to using a little "blow" and an Olympic Gold Medal winner who also is a champion when it comes to using a bong. God help us all. I truly hope that the issue of addiction is taken seriously by Washington soon. There are far too many lives being lost to continue to delay it.

Posted by Brenda on 03 Feb 09 12:42 AM EST
Prevention, Cessation, Education, Recovery - No Funds for Addiction or Substance Abuse Treatment. What happened to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Bill. Insurance companies are far and few between who recognize Substance Abuse and Addiction as a health care concern. You might get lucky if you client has a co-occurring disorder. I am shocked, stunned and speechless. The drive has been to integrate treatment services, now the integration is happening and there seems to be no funding for the cause. What would happen if someone told you they were unable to fund the care of your loved one who was suffering from diabetes or heart failure? Would you refer them for prevention, cessation, education or recovery? Oregon's recommended budget all but eliminates an entire ASAM level of care - Residential (Level 111.5) Treatment Services. Go figure!

Posted by James on 06 Feb 09 11:32 AM EST
Right on, Julian. The problem with this bill is that it contains way too much spending on pet projects and issues that have nothing to do with helping the economy. People are acting as if this is the only bill congress will consider this year and want their "piece of the pie" now. Would it not be more appropriate to discuss prevention and treatment with proposed legislation that is specifically directed toward the needs and issues we face? But, maybe I expect too much from this congress that at this time appears to have their priorities in the wrong place.

Posted by Raymond Conte M.A. on 14 Feb 09 03:38 PM EST
Back in the 70's and 80's when we were starting to pursue Federal money we learned to think outside of the box. That thinking brought about Occupational Alcoholism Programs and Vocational Training Programs. Did we offer ideas in these areas to the folks with the fiscal decision making ? If we want to get something, why don't we give them something they can show a real economic stimulus with, and producing measurable results at the same time. Once we have done that the rest will come. Even though this is a new game, who says we can't use the old playbook. Our field has nothing to lose. People in recovery want a second chance at working. If they are given that second chance, they will do the right thing. Employers need to be reminded that EAP saves money, especially now. It worked once, it can work again.

Posted by Norman Littlejohn CSADC on 25 Feb 09 04:28 AM EST
I am amazed and disappointed that Mr Obama and congress had ignored the urgent need for more funds to treat substance abuse other than methamphetamine abuse. I am fro an area where cocaine, heroin, marijuana and ecstasy addiction is rampant and the need to recognize the connection between crime, unemployment homelessness and other issues is of the utmost importance.But as the saying goes, Promises Promises Promises!!!!!

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines