Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

States Using Alcohol Tax Increases to Address Budget Woes
January 21, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Kentucky and Arkansas have joined New York and California in the latest push by state legislators to increase alcohol taxes as a way to address budgetary shortfalls, the Wall Street Journal reported Jan. 17.

Peter Cressy, chief executive of the trade group Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, said that about 10 states are seeking tax increases, with the possibility of 30 more following suit by the end of the year. While beer and wine tax increases traditionally face strong opposition from alcohol distributors and other affected groups, Cressy believes that "this will be an extremely tough year" to stem the taxation tide.

In Kentucky, a wholesale tax on alcoholic beverages has been proposed in an effort to raise an additional $68 million in revenue; the legislation would add about 25 cents to the cost of a six-pack of beer. "We need the money, and I think among the electorate it will be a good bill," said Rick Nelson, a Kentucky state representative. "The only thing that worries me is that the liquor industry has a lot of money."

The Kentucky Beer Wholesalers Association and the Kentucky Distillers' Association are fighting the bill. "When the national economy is a disaster, it doesn't appear to me that the way to remedy the problem is to increase the tax on the average guy," said Gene McLean, executive director of Kentucky's beer-wholesalers group.

(Why raise alcohol taxes?)

The Kentucky legislation echoes taxation efforts occurring in other states. A proposed increase in beer and wine taxes in New York would add about $63 million to state revenues. A suggested nickel-a-drink alcohol tax in California would generate an estimated $829 million through mid-2010. In Georgia, new legislation would let voters decide whether to allow the sale of alcohol on Sunday in grocery, convenience and liquor stores.

Federal excise taxes on alcohol have not changed since 1991, however, and Cressy voiced optimism that Congress will not raise them this year, either.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by John from Oceanside on 22 Jan 09 02:00 PM EST
The California legislature has already passed a bill earmarking part of the 5 cent a drink funds to pay for all the treatment that is not covered in Federal Block Grant Funds. The problem is that in California you need a 2/3rds vote to pass a tax and since the 5 cent a drink has not passed all the non block grant programs will not have any funding if it does not pass.

Posted by maxwood on 22 Jan 09 07:01 PM EST
I fear this kind of tax-hiking only hardens opposition to decriminalizing cannabis. Why? Because it increases government (and bureaucrat) reluctance to allow anything which really threatens the tax revenue! They know Mr. McLean's "average guy" facing higher alcohol taxes might just turn to cannabis instead. Same, of course, only more so, for tobacco.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines