Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

States Exploring Drug Courts, Other Affordable Alternatives to Prison
July 23, 2009

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

More than 25 states as well as Washington, D.C., are exploring alternative-sentencing methods and revamping probation and parole programs to cut the rising cost of keeping inmates in prison, the Washington Post reported July 13.

Governors and legislatures are particularly investing in drug courts, which offer low-level drug offenders treatment and weekly meetings with a judge as a way of keeping them from serving prison time.  States are also turning to the 500 courts nationwide designated for people arrested for driving under the influence, so that offenders will be sent to treatment programs and undergo random tests instead of being sent to jail.

Probation time in some states is also being reduced, as is the number of people sentenced to prison for minor violations such as failing to appear for scheduled court appointments.

"The economy is bringing a lot of states to the table," said Adam Gelb, who directs the Pew Center on the States Public Safety Performance Project. "The research has pointed to a path for them to [provide] more public safety at less cost."

The average cost to keep an inmate in prison is $79 per day, whereas the daily cost to monitor that person through probation or parole is $3.50, according to the Pew Center.

In an effort to reduce its prison spending, New York has eased mandatory-minimum drug laws enacted during the Rockefeller era, and Virginia is currently seeking sentencing alternatives for its nonviolent offenders.  President Barack Obama has requested more than $200 million from Congress for prisoner-reentry programs. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Steven on 23 Jul 09 10:45 AM EDT
Non-violent drug offenders shouldn't be in prison in the first place. You wouldn't put a cancer patient in jail. Now if they have committed an additional crime ie. shoplift then they should serve what ever penalty is associated w that crime. But for society to place a person in prison for being an addict alone is cruel.

Posted by stopthehate on 23 Jul 09 11:47 AM EDT
I totally agree with Steven. Too bad it took a bad economy to bring lawmakers around to having some common sense and compassion.

Posted by Ron on 23 Jul 09 01:21 PM EDT
Frankly, we shouldn't all the group of thieves and hypocrites in Wash DC (see Monica Lewinski uproar and the dozens pointing fingers who were/had/having affairs themselves, just not caught) to legislate anything re: common sense, all they are good at is speechifying (see 1st day of Sotomayor 'hearings') and assuming we don't have a bit of sense (hmmm, we keep re-sending them their, maybe they know something we don't)...........

Posted by Tim in Montana on 23 Jul 09 02:45 PM EDT
It was always going to take an economic dynamic to drive incarceration of addicts down. Now we have one. The Challenge is to prepare the probation and social work workforce to use best practices with the population of ex-prisoners.

Posted by honestgirl on 23 Jul 09 10:10 PM EDT
What about people in jail for 20 years on a fouth dwi, no treatment and asleep in his car. Probation officer indicted for malfeance in office jail for 2 years. Probation officer never put the person under house arrest as instructed by judge and no drug treatment. Drug Court is a laugh meet once a month. No judge meetings it is a scam. Make the drug courts better and make the jusges do their jobs. Also drug treatment. In louisiana you were to get drug treatment under the Odinet law and on the 1st, 2nd dwi. This person never in a wreck or driving when arrested the last two dwi not in car. 20 years will cost the tax payers of la 1 million or more. If you kill someone by dwi only 5 years probation. Treament has always been the answ er no one will listen. Look at allthe politicians, governors, mayors, with dwi never served a day in jail the la da sons had killed someone in boat accident, 4 dwis, never spent a day in jail and took his bar exam i did not think with a felony you could do this. If i had cancer would they put me in jail. If you have an addicition or alcholic inheritance or gene they throw you away in jail for 20 years.

Posted by Kim S from the midwest! on 27 Jul 09 09:12 AM EDT
As a therapist who is currently working with a team to establish a drug court in our county my concern is that funding to support this effort will be inadequate and therefore, training in research based-interventions will be lacking. Perhaps we need also look at the prison environment; an environment that too many of the nation's population has no idea what goes in. If a spotlight was put on that arena and reform became the focus, we may see more rehabilitation occurring and thus, making our dollars more accountable.

Posted by Rick in Pennsylvania on 27 Jul 09 09:59 AM EDT
The previous notes are confusing and disjointed. People are not put in prison for addiction they are put in prison for committing crimes, including possession and distribution crimes. Sooooo the question is should thay be put in jail for possession and low level distribution crimes and non-violent crimes .... and the answer is NO!!! They should be treated in the community much mrore effectively at a lower cost.

Posted by John on 30 Jul 09 06:05 PM EDT
The Drug Court I work for as a Treatment Counselor has been in exsistence since 1993 and over 2000 have graduated from it and then not been arrested for the next two years that we track them- point made!!

Posted by Larry Gale on 06 Aug 09 01:27 PM EDT
Compulsive gambling is another addiction that contributes to crime across the U.S. Again, appropriate treatment is more effective than incarceration. Check out www.gamblingcourt.org

Posted by Gizelle J. on 14 Aug 09 02:31 PM EDT
Drug Court is by far the best. It helped me change my life & get my kids back. I noticed someone said court 1x a month try a week+aa/na 3x week full time work drug & alcohol tests 3x a week group and individual counseling weekly so you were misinformed & if kids are involved parenting clasess as well it worked for me best thing that ever happened to me & my girls.

Posted by Glenn on 14 Aug 09 05:48 PM EDT
Gizelle must have gone to our drug court judging by the treatment plan described. It is vey intensive, and very effective with recidivism rates under 10% based on tracking for the past three years.

Posted by Sam on 03 Sep 09 09:38 AM EDT
John, I'd like to hear more about your stats. 2000 grads total? Or 2000 didn't get arrested within 2 years, out of how many total grads? A 0% recidivism rate would certainly surprise me.

Posted by ontopofthings on 19 Oct 09 09:27 PM EDT
If we truly want to reduce the numbers in our prisons, we MUST start funneling more money into prevention and awareness in our school systems. We have very little funding available for prevention and awareness. Mandatory parenting classes to educate the parents on addiction should also be protocol for all public schools. Years of research has proven that parents who talk to their children about substance abuse are much more likely to raise children who do NOT get involved with drugs/alcohol. Research also shows that most parents are not having these conversations with their children. I believe it is safe to say that many parents do not know enough about substance abuse to have these conversations. We, as a society, are putting our money in the wrong place! It is much easier to save them from substance abuse than it is to treat those already affected! We have to start with our youth...our leaders of tomorrow.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments