Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Researcher Reveals Past Addiction as Policy Shifts
June 25, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Kathie Kane-Willis sees the government's recent push to steer addicts to treatment rather than prison from a fairly unique perspective: not only is she a social researcher who specializes in issues of drug abuse, but she also struggled with a heroin addiction herself, the Chicago Tribune reported June 14.

At a June 12 drug-policy conference at Roosevelt University, Kane-Willis, 40, spoke of her downward spiral into a life of addiction and how she recovered after receiving treatment instead of a lengthy jail sentence -- an advantage she said many addicts don't have.

"I'm telling my story because I feel as though the tide is finally turning," Kane-Willis told the packed meeting hall. "I hope and pray that I'm right about this feeling, that the war on drugs really might be coming to an end. This social-justice movement is gaining strength, and I want to add my voice, my story and my face to it."

Kane-Willis began using heroin during her freshman year of college, and for two years battled her addiction as she moved from one state to the next. She said a brief jail stint in Los Angeles helped to not only get her sober, but also gave her life a purpose. Afterward she earned a master's degree in sociology at Roosevelt University and works as a researcher in the school's Institute of Metropolitan Affairs.

Kane-Willis said her story underscores the new turn in America's "war on drugs" as government officials, notably President Obama's drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, are working to treat addiction as a public-health problem, not solely a criminal one.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Lupe M., CATC, California on 26 Jun 09 11:57 AM EDT
I am so glad I hear a sensible report on the reality that addiction is not a choice once it transitions from first time use to ongoing use, abuse,dependance etc. It really is a health problem in which individuals have to set aside their own feelings and focus on facts and take action. So that society as a whole can make a difference in their communities and beat this nasty/ugly war (drugs) that affect all facts of live without discrimination.

Posted by Cynthia K., CCS, CADC II on 26 Jun 09 02:34 PM EDT
I sure wish you were right but I don't think we are there...quite yet. The "war on drugs" was lost before it started, but that never stopped staunch do-gooders from waiving their moral flag around, as if God kissed them on the forehead himself and said, "never mind that part about Jesus helping others". This war is one of morality, not reason or common sense. Treatment works and many of us know that. Unfortunately, the money is not flowing to treatment. As I read this article, I thought about the cut to Proposition 36 funding. That tells me more than anything. If treatment were valued, it would be paid for! I am also baffled about the cut to prisons and jails. I thought that was the beginning of a new day but now it just seems that there is no room in jail, if you end up there, you will likely not receive treatment, and if you are not sent to jail, there are no funds to pay for treatment. Seems like we still have a long way to go but I remain optimistic.

Posted by Verde on 26 Jun 09 03:26 PM EDT
They need to quit putting the burden on the taxpayers. If you are dumb enough to try drugs/alcohol when you are constantly warned about addiction, than you should be responsible to pay for the treatment. When these addicts get arrested, it should be court ordered restitution to the program they get sent to. I am so done with handing dollars over to the government for programs I get no benifit from. The government should not dilly-dally in the health or mental health proffessions. The president needs to focus on leading this country back to having high moral and ethical standards and promote holding people accoutable for their mistakes. Why should I pay, when I listened to my mother and father and did not get addicted to drugs. Once again, there are no rewards for doing things right, and no punishment for screwing up. Their is no obedience to the law, so why do we spend billions on congress and the senate to make laws. Fire them all and save our money. I propose no new laws and a four year layoff of congressmen and senators. Think of the money the lobbyist would save. Use that money for your addiction issues.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 26 Jun 09 07:02 PM EDT
Verde I think this is the first time I have disagreed with you. I believe in treatment but also with a concequences. If you have treatment failures the last stop is jail. There has to be a concequense. Jail has saved many an addict.

Posted by Verde on 27 Jun 09 01:49 AM EDT
John, we are on the same sheet of music, I ust get so fed up with the fact that people that get themselves addicted pay nothing for their mistakes and the taxpayer is forced to house them, feed them, and pay for their doctors when many average citizen struggle to provide for themselves and their families. I agree that jail is the perfect place for people that don't clean up. But we can't hold these addicts for long and as soon as they hit the streets, statistics have shown the majority return to the same addiction lifestyle the had before prison. They have to want to be clean and most don't.

Posted by niina on 29 Jun 09 01:38 PM EDT
Sometimes it takes quite a while for someone to WANT treatment. They have to go on and prove it to themselves that they can not live and keep using. Common sense is not always common.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines