Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Push Begins for Conn. Marijuana Decriminalization
March 30, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The Connecticut Senate Majority Leader is the main sponsor of a bill that would decriminalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana, which supporters say would save up to $11 million a year in police, court, and jail expenses.

The Connecticut Post reported March 25 that Senate Majority Leader Martin M. Looney, a New Haven Democrat, said the measure also would generate $320,000 annually in fines, which would replace misdemeanors and arrest as the penalty for possession for small amounts of marijuana.

During a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Chief State's Attorney Kevin Kane argued that current Connecticut law already effectively decriminalizes minor possession of marijuana and disputed Looney's definition of up to an ounce of marijuana as a "small" amount.

Looney noted that voters in neighboring Massachusetts recently voted to decriminalize possession of up to an ounce of marijuana and capped fines for violations at $150. Looney said research showed that about a quarter of the 3,200 people arrested for marijuana possession under the current law in Connecticut were carrying less than an ounce of the drug.

Rep. Arthur O'Neill said Looney's bill seemed to be "codifying current practice" in Connecticut, but others said that marijuana was a "gateway" drug and that decriminalization might benefit drug dealers.

"I don't think it would necessarily alter consumption patterns," Looney said. "People are either going to use the substance or not, based upon other factors in their lives, but I think what it would really do, as the people in Massachusetts were persuaded, is it will save the casual user from having a criminal record that will follow him throughout his whole life for something that is I think a very minor offense that is more properly treated as an infraction rather than a criminal violation."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Homer on 31 Mar 09 10:04 AM EDT
It doesn't make a difference if marijuana is legal or illegal it causes lots of problems, which the liberals try to agnore, with the person and his/her familyh

Posted by jrzshor on 31 Mar 09 03:08 PM EDT
Save "$11 million a year in police, court, and jail expenses." and what bright fool failed to calculated the "other" costs of mj smoking?

Posted by maxwood on 31 Mar 09 04:40 PM EDT
1. Collisions with the legal system (which is the best Big Tobackgo can buy to squelch competition) are the number one cause of "lots of problems, which liberals try to ignore, with the person and his/her familyh". 2. The second biggest problem, "gateway drug effect", is caused by the hot burning overdose tobacco smoking procedure (cigarettes alias joints) transferred over onto cannabis, with the result that children afraid to get caught owning a miniature smoking utensil, e-cigarette or vaporizer wind up using the overdose cigarette method and, from mixing with tobacco (blunt) or hanging around places where cigarettes are smoked, get hooked on the most dangerous drug of all, tobacco.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines