Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Oregon Lawmakers Want State to Grow and Distribute Medical Marijuana
March 16, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Legislators in Oregon have introduced a bill authorizing the state to grow and distribute marijuana for medical-marijuana patients, the Oregon Statesman Journal reported March 12.

The legislation requires that the state establish and operate a marijuana-production facility and be responsible for the distribution of the drug to pharmacies, which would then dispense marijuana to medical-use cardholders and primary caregivers. The bill also would impose a $98-per-ounce tax on marijuana to finance the state's operating costs and for production-center security.

The law currently allows registered patients to possess six mature marijuana plants, 18 immature seedlings, and 24 ounces of usable marijuana.

Backers called the bill a safety measure that will that will help eliminate private marijuana growing sites and "take medical marijuana off the streets and into a safer and more secure environment," said state Rep. Chris Harker.

Patient safety is an added concern, supporters said. "Many patients have no assurance that their marijuana is not laced with pesticides or other toxic chemicals," said Rep. Jim Thompson.

Oregon was the second state in the U.S. to approve the use of medical marijuana, doing so in a 1998 referendum. As of January 2008, medical-marijuana cards were held by 20,842 patients and 10,424 caregivers.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Dwayne Polidori on 17 Mar 09 08:23 AM EDT
Here we go again take more work and money away from the people. we pay government and they know best. The new Russia

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 17 Mar 09 11:22 AM EDT
This proposal has merit and I hope it gets a serious hearing. The vast majority of patients who would benefit from medical marijuana have neither the expertise, the energy nor the time necessary to produce medicallly useful cannabis. In addition, many of them (e.g., newly diagnosed cancer patients) need access to cannabis at the time of their diagnosis, not 6-8 months later when their first medically useful cannabis could be harvested. This Oregon proposal also reduces the cost of medical cannabis far below the obscene amounts now being charged in California and elsewhere. At least two other states (New Mexico and Rhode Island) have considered similar approaches. The NM program got sabotaged by non-supportive and/or inattentive bureaucrats and the RI proposal is still pending. Good luck, Oregon.

Posted by me on 17 Mar 09 11:44 AM EDT
i've never understood the whole medical marijuana issue. a doc gives you a prescription, and then you still have to go "johnny on the corner" to get it? i always thought if you're going to do it, MEDICAL MARIJUANA should be FDA controlled and sold in pharmacies not from some joe on the street.

Posted by Diane Kopperman on 17 Mar 09 01:46 PM EDT
You clearly don't know how medical marijuana works in Oregon. Doctors don't give prescriptions. Doctor-mills write the letter that is necessary for going to the State to get the medical marijuana card. Growers with cards are not "johnny on the corner" and buying from them is still a crime. Growers have cards issued by the State, too, and can have only a few "clients" (.e., customers). The problem in Oregon is the amount of pot that people can legally possess which, if you figured it out, would mean that they would have to smoke at least five times a day to use it all, which means they SELL THE REST!! The proposed new system would at least do away with that part of the medical marijuana problem, but it fails to address the issue that a majority of "patients" have MINOR illnesses, pain, or irritable bowel syndrome, but haven't gone to mainstream doctors for a diagnosis and don't take ANY legitimate medications for them. We aren't concerned about the legitamcy of the cancer or AIDS patient, and we don't even bother to argue about them in Oregon. Don't confuse the two groups.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 17 Mar 09 06:39 PM EDT
Diane, I'm not sure what you meant by "confusing the two groups". Neither the Oregon program nor any other state mmj program allows patients to access medical cannabis as soon as they need it UNLESS that cannabis comes from the illicit market (California is a major case in point.) Having a reliable, legal source available as soon as patients qualify would be a major step forward. As far as qualifying medical conditions, physicians now can prescribe any medication for any medical condition, regardless of whether that decision is consistent with the medication's labeling. Why should medical cannabis be different? As far as the quantity that patients can possess, a patient who uses an ounce a week (not uncommon for seriously ill users) and who grows her medicine outdoors has one harvest per year to last them until the next harvest. Under that condition, the 24 oz. rule in Oregon would only get that patient half-way through the year, after which they would likely return to the illicit market. So I doubt that all Oregon patients are selling their excess when they may not have any excess to sell. In any case, this proposed Oregon law would solve all these problems.

Posted by GandolfTheWise on 21 Apr 09 01:40 AM EDT
As a person that does not smoke (anything), but because of certain medical conditions I am now considering trying it rather than medications with many unwanted side effects. I am also one of the poor seniors living on a very low SS income. I object to paying a TAX of $98/oz over the cost of the product, when I could grow it myself much cheaper. I would definitely NOT use pesticides as some seem to be concerned about that. At that cost - if paid by my medicare, I would probably hit the medigap number, and then either die or be unable to afford food and rent. (That is Congress's way of handling the SS problem - just kill off the old folks if they depend on meds to live.)

Posted by Ron Jennings on 04 Oct 09 09:48 PM EDT
I have harsh pain in lower legs due to Blood Vessel damage which cause blood pooling. The pain and swelling to spend most of my time with legs elevated and I have a hard time walking. I tried THC at the Hemp Fest and walked near a mile to catch the bus home. I also got the best nights sleep that I have had in over five years. I am asking my Dr. for a card but I am 68 yrs. old living on Social Security and have Medicare B but cannot afford $98.00 an oz. to buy it. I doubt the new health bill that Obama wants will be of any help. What about the seniors that live on limited incomes and do not have a place to grow their own.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines