Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Ohio Prosecutors Propose Elimination of Some Mandatory Prison Sentences
March 26, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Ohio criminal prosecutors are backing a plan to eliminate some mandatory prison sentences for trafficking and possessing chemicals for the manufacture of drugs, the Columbus Dispatch reported March 24.

The changes proposed by http://www.ohiopa.org/  Ohio prosecutors will amend "tough-on-crime" laws from the 1980's and 1990's. They also proposed reducing some non-drug crimes -- like assaulting a school teacher, administrator, or school-bus operator -- to misdemeanors from felonies.

The plan would also give judges greater flexibility to send second-time drug offenders to drug treatment rather than back to prison.

"There is a little bit different view on drug offenses than there was 20 years ago when many of these laws were enacted," said John Murphy, executive director of the Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.

Possession or trafficking of a kilogram of powder cocaine and 20 kilograms of marijuana would still result in a mandatory prison sentence, said David Droll, head of the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Pat on 27 Mar 09 10:50 AM EDT
I am totally in favor of this for possessing drugs and hope the rest of the states will follow up. I have mixed feeling about lessening traffickers mandatory sentences. Possession charges, at least the second, third, etc. time is usually because of the disease of addiction and sending the addict back to jail will not help. "Tough on crime" has not decreased the number of addicts in the world. As long as there are sellers, we are going to have addicts. The sellers are doing this for the money, not because of an uncontrollable urge. They do not deserve lesser sentences, in my opinion. They have ruined enough lives and should be kept off the steets I believe.

Posted by L. Tanaka on 27 Mar 09 09:45 PM EDT
Finally, some humane thinking and uncommon sense. Now let's see money for treatment be saved. Let's see who knows what about what youths' need to grow up able to withstand peer pressure to conform to stupid behaviors on the part of adults - our media idols and flavors of the week. Let's see who (again adults) is doing what to de-value money and material things.

Posted by lisaf-breakingthecycles on 28 Mar 09 11:43 AM EDT
Working on the overall problem from the treatment angle makes so much more sense. Helping naysayers understand the facts about addiction as a chronic relapsing brain disease will go a long way to helping them see the value of this approach. Helping addicts/alcoholics understand the same will go a long way to making their treatment a success. Check out www.hbo.com/addiction (produced by HBO, NIAAA, NIDA and Robert Wood Johnson Foundaiton) for great information.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines