Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Obama Orders End to Prosecution of Medical-Marijuana Patients
October 20, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Individuals legally using or supplying medical marijuana under state law should not be prosecuted under federal drug laws, the Obama administration has ordered.

The Los Angeles Times reported Oct. 19 that the U.S. Justice Department has issued a new directive that clarifies earlier statements by Attorney General Eric Holder, who indicated that federal prosecutors and drug agents had more pressing priorities than prosecuting medical-marijuana patients and suppliers.

Obama expressed support for medical marijuana as a candidate for president and promised to end federal raids on medical-marijuana dispensaries. However, some raids continued to take place even after he took office.

The federal government will continue to target marijuana suppliers whose operations violate state laws, according to the new guidelines.

"It will not be a priority to use federal resources to prosecute patients with serious illnesses or their caregivers who are complying with state laws on medical marijuana, but we will not tolerate drug traffickers who hide behind claims of compliance with state law to mask activities that are clearly illegal," said Holder. "This balanced policy formalizes a sensible approach that the Department has been following since January: effectively focus our resources on serious drug traffickers while taking into account state and local laws."

"This is a huge victory for medical-marijuana patients," said Steph Sherer, executive director of the medical-marijuana group Americans for Safe Access. "This indicates that President Obama intends to keep his promise -- and represents a significant departure from the policies of the Bush administration.''

Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington currently have medical-marijuana laws on the books.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by me on 20 Oct 09 10:48 AM EDT
well i guess i knew this day was coming since the last 3 presidents we've had were all admitted drug-users. don't use drugs kids, it'll get you nowhere. i could be president! i guess it's not long now before they legalize it outright. geez.

Posted by darlene on 20 Oct 09 11:08 AM EDT
legalizing pot is just a for-runner to legalizing other illegal grugs. I am a terminally ill person but I do not use pot. There are other LEGAL prescription drugs that are effective.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 20 Oct 09 11:12 AM EDT
This Policy Statement changed nothing from the Bush Administration. The DEA will still go after marijuana dispensaries that violate state law and we have not found one in California that follows state law. Marijuana can't be sold for profit. The DEA never targeted so called patients or individual caregivers. This is a no change policy statement to quiet the stoned population of California.

Posted by Bill Godshall on 20 Oct 09 11:52 AM EDT
This is reasonable, responsible, and long overdue federal public policy change. Just as prohibition laws for cigarettes and alcohol (which kill 50-100 times more Americans than all illegal drugs combined) would be a societal disaster, so are current drug probition laws. Those who advocate/defend laws that criminalize and imprison fellow citizens for merely putting something into their own bodies should learn to respect the rights of others and deal with their own issues of intolerance.

Posted by anony-mouse on 20 Oct 09 02:25 PM EDT
To "me" (first post) -- What are you saying? That kids should not use any drugs at all? Even mild pain meds after a tooth extraction or surgery??? You are way 'black and white' here. Scary... To "Darlene" -- It's about sensible choices here. Not everybody is you. Having a terminal illness does not give you the right to prohibit others (from the 14 States where medical mj is legal) from using it. Sorry. It only gives you the right to decide for yourself how you will treat your illness. More "black and white" thinking here. Scary... To Bill: A voice of reason. Ahhhhh! Hats off to you!

Posted by Rose Marie from Boston on 20 Oct 09 03:44 PM EDT
This is an outrage. When in the history of our country has any president had the right to change any laws without taking it before the congress and senate who represent the constituents that elected them.? Medicinal marijuana use is not the real issue here. Mr. Obama's continuing endeavors for dictatorship is what we need to address. Any fool knows that legalization of an illicit drug of any kind will lead to across the board legalization of all drugs. Enough is enough!!!

Posted by Steve Briley on 20 Oct 09 05:21 PM EDT
I hate to see the government step in and tell anyone how to control their body or manage a disease that they are afflicted with however, marijuana has such long-term effects and places the general public in danger if the user is driving, working, operating machinery and etc. My main concern is when the user believes the effect has worn off, it hasn't! THC also encapsulates the brain cell and long-term use inhibits cognition and motivation not to mention the damage to other organs.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 20 Oct 09 05:57 PM EDT
I will state again this is not a new policy. I hope that Join Together runs National Drug Policy Director Gil Kerlikowske statement he made on this policy today. It will futher clarify that selling weed in dispensaries will still get you arrested.

Posted by Terry on 20 Oct 09 07:16 PM EDT
Marijuana is here to stay whether my religion or personal belief system likes it or not. Tax and regulate marijuana is the option that should be implemented to get this widely used substance out of the hands of drug cartels, compulsive users out of prison, and provide the social benefit of taxes. The tax dollars can be used to help prevent teenage and youth use (like we do for alcohol) and to help pay the public health consequences from compulsive use. Law enforcement and the courts should use the dollars saved from marijuana enforcement, prosecution, and incarceration to focus on reducing the local and global impact of drug cartels and drug terrorists.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 20 Oct 09 08:48 PM EDT
Actually, Rose Marie, the CSA statute which placed cannabis in Schedule I (thereby precluding its use, federally, as medicine), directs the Attorney General with the task of determining what substances belong in that category. So you see, President Obama is actually following the law. Mr Briley, the only proven long term effects of cannabis are a reduction in neck, throat and head sarcomas. Emergency room studies indicate that cannabis use does not significantly impair safety. In fact, true science, when applied to cannabis, shows its general beneficence, belying baseless government propaganda to the contrary. Don't you all think it would be better to regulate this substance rather than perpetuating the free-for-all that only encourages underground activity. I certainly do.

Posted by David Turner on 20 Oct 09 09:22 PM EDT
Here we go again, 1932 redux. With all due respect to our new and well-intended president, we just embarked on the slippery slope of drug liberalization. What we should have been doing is reforming penalties for use, not decriminalization.

Posted by nina lopez on 21 Oct 09 10:13 AM EDT
Posted by anony-mouse...... You said exactly what I was about to say. Talk about black and white thinking. And any one who said it will lead to other drugs being legal have no idea that that is true. I agree that the users need to be careful but it is the same with any pain med. They can stay off the road just as drunks should. Get out of the dark ages.

Posted by Mother of Snooch on 26 Oct 09 11:27 AM EDT
Criminalization has never worked to control illicit drugs. As David Turner said, "1932 redux." Alcohol, e.g. has the greatest number of users, but fewest number of addicts (of the estimated # of users) compared to illicit drugs like cocaine. Why? B/c society's attitudes and values around alcohol help control usage for MOST people. Put money into prevention and treatment.

Posted by BfromB1P on 26 Oct 09 12:05 PM EDT
For those who do find relief from pharmaceuticals, THAT'S GREAT. But what about people like my father, who doesn't use cannabis, but at this point would try ANYTHING to help stop the progression of his disease. There are NO magical pills, and because of our nations ignorance, we know all to little of the benefits that cannabis might with-hold! Stop the B.S. start the research!

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines