Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Obama Could Change Antidrug Tactics in Afghanistan
March 23, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Richard Holbrooke, the Obama administration's envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, has harshly criticized the antidrug strategy being implemented in the region, indicating that significant changes may be on the way.

"The United States alone is spending over $800 million a year on counter-narcotics. We have gotten nothing out of it, nothing," said Holbrooke. "It is the most wasteful and ineffective program I have seen in 40 years."

The Times of London reported March 23 that Afghanistan continues to lead the world in heroin production, and efforts to eradicate poppy crops have alienated farmers and increased sympathy for the Taliban. Obama is planning to ask Congress to shift focus to rebuilding the Afghan economy and boosting the police force.

"What we're looking for is a comprehensive strategy," Obama said. "And there's got to be an exit strategy."

"By forced [drug] eradication we are often pushing farmers into the Taliban hands," Holbrooke said. "We are going to try to reprogram that money. About $160 million is for alternate livelihoods and we would like to increase that."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by maxwood on 24 Mar 09 06:07 PM EDT
Don't know if Obama could get this past the veto power of Big Tobackgo and its bought representation on Capitol Hill, but how about restoring the Afghan hashish industry? Think it over, would it be a bad thing if just about all that opium cultivation were replaced by cannabis? In the 1970's Afghanistan exported a rich black hashish with white mold on top (known in Berlin as Schimmelafghan). The U.S.A. used military pressure and economic sanctions to suppress that crop which was replaced by easier-to-smuggle heroin. (Also 1980's Colombian marijuana-- "Got dat Bo!"-- was suppressed by U.S.A. money and replaced by cocaine; strong green riefer from domestic grow houses was spied on by heat-sensor planes and replaced by meth labs etc. "When will they ever learn.")

Posted by Brinna on 25 Mar 09 02:10 AM EDT
Thank the Gods! Someone in Washington has noticed that our national drug policy has been pouring billions of dollars down the toilet with (to quote Holbrook) absolutely nothing to show for it. Can we believe that Change has finally come. Please,let it be true.

Posted by Sheila on 25 Mar 09 01:38 PM EDT
Where does our government think that a large portion of the the opium that they leave undestroyed will end up? I realize that we do not want to alienate the farmers in Afganistan, but what about endangering our children with increasing the opium supply in our country? We want to spend additional money on giving our children a superior education but our children have to have brains that are not drug damaged in order to benefit from the superior educational opportunities available to them.

Posted by MG on 25 Mar 09 03:53 PM EDT
Christopher Hitchens had probably what is the best idea yet. The government should simply buy the poppy itself. Instead of spending all this money on eradication, we can give it directly to the farmers at above market rates, giving them a continued income and currying their favor and keeping the product away from the traffickers. The government can then destroy the crop or sell/give it to legitimate pharmas.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines