Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

New York's Harsh Drug Laws Set to Fall
March 3, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The New York state legislature is poised to repeal its Rockefeller-era drug laws, sweeping away the last of a set of harsh mandatory sentences in place since the 1970s, the New York Times reported March 1.

The state Assembly is expected to approve a measure this week to return sentencing discretion to judges and allow jurists to send low-level drug offenders to addiction treatment programs rather than prison. Thousands of inmates previously convicted of drug offenses also would be given a pathway to reducing or commuting their sentences.

Gov. David A. Paterson -- an early backer of repealing the Rockefeller laws -- is also drafting legislation on judicial discretion, and the Senate may vote on sentencing reform in the coming weeks. "When we take away those mandatory minimums and restore judicial discretion, that's when you can say Rockefeller is no longer there," said Assemblyman Jeffrion L. Aubry.

In 2004, state lawmakers eliminated some aspects of the law, including ending life sentences for drug crimes and trimming other sentences. But some mandatory sentencing provisions remain, which has limited the ability of judges to divert offenders to treatment.

"I think any bill that doesn't provide that diversion option is really not something that's significant reform, plain and simple," said Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver. "There is nothing else at this point that would be meaningful in terms of reform."

Some, however, still resist the notion of giving judges full discretion over sentencing. "The district attorney's input would be taken out of the equation," said Bridget G. Brennan, special narcotics prosecutor for New York City. "When I look at cases, I want to have the discretion as gatekeeper, to make sure that somebody I put back out in the community is not going to pose a public-safety threat. A district attorney has a much clearer picture of a community's concerns."

The need for quality treatment programs remains a challenge, just as it was in the 1970s. "We can give judges more latitude, but we have to make sure there's someplace for drug felons to go, and that they don't just walk out," said state Sen. Dale Volker. "There are a lot of questions to be answered: How will these people stay in treatment? Will they just end up back on the street?"

Sen. Eric T. Schneiderman called the proposed reforms "an opportunity to shift the framework of drug policy in America from a model centered on incarceration."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Jim Sharp on 03 Mar 09 03:55 PM EST
This development along with increased funding for addiction treatment (via the stimulus package) provides the opportunity to (1) eliminate harsh, mandatory sentences that did not address the treatment needs of addicts caught up in the criminal justice system while (2) expanding effective treatment programs. The state of NY (OASAS) already has the data on which programs are effective and worthy of expansion/duplication. In particular, "person-centered" addiction treatment programs that (1) respect patients and (2) incorporate the patient's own goals into treatment while (3) utilizing research-based techniques have outstanding retention rates and outcomes. If NY simply funds traditional programs then the opportunity will be blown.

Posted by joebanana on 03 Mar 09 05:08 PM EST
It's about time. Especially when it comes to hemp. Our government is suppressing a huge cash crop that could help out with the unemployment and revenue problems this country is having. With some 25,000 products being able to be produced by one plant. Not to mention the world hunger that could be wiped out. However bad the government has said hemp is, the opposite is true.

Posted by Luis M. Lozano on 03 Mar 09 06:52 PM EST
A step in the right direction. I hope this is motivated more on common sense and not on purely economics. Many states will start seeing the light and realize that sending drug addicts to prison costs more than helping them recover and rehabilitate. The current system is bankrupting states and depleting money for other more worthwhile programs such and education and health care.

Posted by Tommy on 03 Mar 09 07:15 PM EST
joebanana: I'm not quite sure what 25,000 products you are referring to.

Posted by maxwood on 03 Mar 09 09:03 PM EST
1. Tommy: the idea is, free of arrest, discrimination and other threats, the sober moderate cannabis users will indeed invent more than 25,000 products from hemp, want to give it a try? 2. I hope Gov. Paterson will support a distinction between cannabis and "drugs". Is our tobackgo-tax-backed government system ready for the possibility that marijuana legalization could finish off not only smack, crack, meth etc. but $$Big Tobackgo too, with the hot-burning overdose cigarette marketing genocide as we have known it?

Posted by shelwoy on 04 Mar 09 12:52 PM EST
This is great news.Nobody should go to prison for an addiction.Addiction is a disease and needs to be treated medically.What if a diabetic went to prison for having a syringe for their insulin? Same scenario, and if anyone disagrees-get educated on how individuals with addictive tendencies have different brains.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines