Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

New Formula Makes Meth Easier to Manufacture
August 26, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A new method for making methamphetamine requires less technical knowledge and fewer over-the-counter cold pills, presenting a new challenge to law-enforcement officials, the Associated Press reported Aug. 24.

Methamphetamine users are reportedly making small batches of the drug for their own use with the so-called "shake and bake" approach. The method requires only a two-liter soda bottle, a small number of over-the-counter cold pills containing pseudoephedrine, and a few household chemicals -- far less complicated than the dirty and dangerous process used at clandestine meth labs where larger quantities of the drug are typically produced.

However, the new method remains hazardous: drug batches are smaller, but the mix of chemicals in the soda bottle can still explode. "If there is any oxygen at all in the bottle, it has a propensity to make a giant fireball," said Sgt. Jason Clark of the Missouri State Highway Patrol's Division of Drug and Crime Control. "You're not dealing with rocket scientists here anyway. If they get unlucky at all, it can have a very devastating reaction." A number of burn cases have been linked to the shake-and-bake method, experts said.

Not only can the meth-making tools now be carried in a small bag, the method requires such a small amount of cold pills that users can dodge limits on sales of pseudoephedrine-based drugs imposed at the height of the meth epidemic.

Officials in the Midwestern U.S. fear that the new meth-production method is fueling a recent increase in use of the drug, which had declined after the initial crackdown on meth labs and restrictions on meth-making chemicals.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by tom mcnamara on 27 Aug 09 03:23 PM EDT
This method has been around for several years.Another example of the media latching on to a label[shake and bake],and ignoring critical issues

Posted by SisterCrystal on 27 Aug 09 03:35 PM EDT
I can't see this 'new' method changing much. Regardless of the method used, making meth is NOT a simple synthesis the average person can successfully perform without special training or equipment. The aspiring chemist must spend considerable time in research, materials acquisition and preparation, and developing proper lab technique. The overwhelming majority will give up long before they can hope to produce any usable product, while those who are committed enough will generally succeed at whatever method they eventually employ.

Posted by Renee on 28 Aug 09 07:18 AM EDT
making meth is a simple process. as a recovering addict I can tell you this method HAS beed around for years. and having oxygen in the bottle DOES NOT make it explode. They just say that to scare people. Like meth needs help scareing people. We should be discussing where to find money to fund more treatment programs in our recent crisis. In IL treatment centers are losing money and closing left and right. Yet a article that repeats unfactual information is what we are talking about?

Posted by Rufus B on 28 Aug 09 10:05 AM EDT
There are a lot of critical issues here and whether the new method will change much in the way of consumption trends remains to be seen. Two immediate items of concern with this method are that it circumvents some of our most effective environmental strategies for meth prevention 1) the quantity of pseudoephedrine required is below the limits that some states now have set into law and 2) it uses ammonia nitrate which is much easier to obtain than anhydrous ammonia. We have strategies to limit access to anhydrous but we’ll have to retool to deal with the ammonia nitrate issue. I would like to think that Sister Crystal is right when she says that the overwhelming majority will give up before they master the technique, but when I think back to all that jerky newsreel footage of those “daring young men in their flying machines” nose diving into the brink, I somehow doubt it. Crashes always happen to someone else right? And remember, the folks who are cooking this stuff are not exactly dealing with a full deck, so their perception of risk is a skosh outside the norm. This new method may not lead to a spike in consumption, but it very well could cause an increase in consequences, (explosions, injury death, clean up of toxic waste), and consequences are really what we are trying to prevent in the first place.

Posted by SisterCrystal on 28 Aug 09 11:51 PM EDT
You are both absolutely right of course. The real issue is not one of chemistry, it is one of culture. A culture where people DO take such crazy chances, and finding new ways of making drugs is much easier than finding effective treatment or a community with a workable crisis management plan.

Posted by ColoradoDan on 01 Sep 09 01:39 PM EDT
Quick search of "shake and bake" meth in 2001 on Google news is bringing up stories. Nothing new. Nothing different. In culture or chemistry. Or even in nomenclature. Or in sensationalized reporting. Just another slow news day, I guess. http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2000&as_user_hdate=2001&q=meth+shake+and+bake&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&q=meth+shake+and+bake&lnav=od&btnG=Go

Posted by naccaatt on 02 Sep 09 12:50 PM EDT
Sistercrystal, you are quite mistaken. making meth is passed on thru a single night's teaching, one addict to another. show the chemicals,show which ones go together when, and how and you're done. I've seen it. chemists take longer only because they want to be safe and do it to laboratory quality.

Posted by bradb on 21 Sep 09 04:20 PM EDT
Wermacht soldiers during WWII used this "cold" method, (also referred to as the "Nazi" method) to make small batches as they exhausted their issued ration.

Posted by micknacksRx on 17 Nov 09 09:13 AM EST
thats ryt... its an old school method.. hey im just 19... bieng a Dx lord aint that easy... especially for the you say "new method"... IT GIVES METH... BUT SMALL QUANTITIES.. i can still afford to go to college with my "mini underground business"=)

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines