Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

More States Considering Prescription Laws to Battle Meth
October 28, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The state of Oregon requires a prescription to purchase certain formerly over-the-counter medications that can be used to make methamphetamine, and now other states are considering similar laws, the Wall Street Journal reported Oct. 21.

The 2005 Oregon law applies to drugs that contain pseudoephedrine, which in other states can be sold without a prescription but only in limited quantities and from behind the pharmacy counter.

Meth-related arrests in Oregon have fallen 43 percent since the law went into effect, and the number of meth-lab seizures has plummeted as well. In other states, however, the number of meth labs has increased, and meth producers have sent groups of people into pharmacies to buy the maximum legal amount of pseudoephedrine drugs in order to get the raw materials they need.

The Oregon law was the basis of ordinances recently passed in Washington, Mo., and Union, Mo., and state lawmakers in Missouri, California, Oklahoma and Montana are considering similar proposals. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has drafted federal legislation that could be introduced in Congress later this year.

"To me, [what Oregon did] is the answer," said Richard Stratman, mayor of Washington, Mo. "If you can tie up the pseudoephedrine and make it difficult to obtain, you can get the job maybe not completely done, but you can put a pretty good dent in those labs."

Pharmaceutical companies oppose the laws, saying they are inconvenient and expensive for consumers. As an alternative, the Consumer Healthcare Products Association, a trade group, is proposing an electronic monitoring system for drug sales, funded by manufacturers. The system would alert local authorities about attempts to exceed the legal purchase limits.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by vwalker on 29 Oct 09 10:38 AM EDT
This is inconvenient and expensive for consumers. However, I would rather have this be a matter between me and my doctor than, as is the case in California, between me and some law enforcement database. Meanwhile, last month in Mexico, within the span of one week, there were two pseudoephedrine seizures that totalled 37 tons.

Posted by Bob on 29 Oct 09 11:13 AM EDT
Prescription only medications are reserved for potent drugs that can pose a safety or health issue if not properly prescribed and used. Pseudoephedrine is a safe and effective decongestent that has been available OTC the decades. Prescription only would mean that patients would be requiresd to see a doctor which would add to the cost of health care when we are trying to reduce the cost of health care in the US. A common cold is easily self medicated and we don't want to send patients to see a family physician or emergency department for a health issue they can take care of themselves. Solving the domestic methamphetamine manufacturing problem should not be at the expense of legitimate patients and our health care system. The current system can only be effective if the records are monitored and that can only be done efficiently if the records are part of a national electronic data base.

Posted by Diane Kopperman on 29 Oct 09 01:11 PM EDT
There are a number of problems with Oregon's prescription-only law. One is that although the numbers of arrests and meth labs here have plummetted, they have just MOVED TO OTHER STATES. Second, the cost of the most effective decongestant of all time has increased, which means that people must rely on relatively INEFFECTIVE substitutes, or go without. Third, we have the technology to pin point where excessive amounts of ephedra are being shipped, so other measures could have been taken to discourage complicit countries from permitting the importation of the drug that is clearly being used for the manufacture of meth and not tx. Fourth, as vwalker points out above, 37 tons of the drug were recently seized in Mexico, which means that the production of meth has moved across the border and is now under the control of drug cartels. Not only have we limited the availability of a very effective drug, we have also increased the dangerousness of the meth trade exponentially. Placing pseudephedra behind the counter was a reasonable compromise, as are the suggestions that Bob proposes, because the neighborhood cook couldn't muster the resources to send out hundreds of people to buy small quantities (whereas drug cartels can), yet the supply was still safe and available for the average citizen. The game has changed now, however, with new procedures that can make meth from extremely small quantities of pseudoephedra, so the points might be moot anyway. Bob, your point regarding the purpose of prescription medications is spot on. Pseudoephedra does not qualify as a dangerous drug and it should not be controlled in this way.

Posted by Corbett on 30 Oct 09 06:40 PM EDT
My concern, besides those voiced by others, is that for people on very low incomes, they would have to pay twice to get this drug. Once for what is likely to be a Dr. appointment co-pay and again when they buy the drug. I think that having them in a pharmacy with a log for who purchases the drugs that is open to police scrutiny is best. Not everyone can go to the Drs. office when they need of want to. If they even get an appt which is another whole issue.

Posted by kengibson on 02 Nov 09 02:38 PM EST
Whats more deadly,a stuffy nose or dealing/using/manufacturing methamphetamine?

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines