Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Medical Marijuana Providers Need to Know Patients, Colorado Court Rules
November 2, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

A Colorado court has let stand the drug conviction of a woman who supplied marijuana to medical-marijuana dispensaries, saying the she did not qualify as a "caregiver" under state law because she did not have direct contact with patients, the Denver Post reported Oct. 30.

Robert Corry, the attorney for Stacy Clendenin, who was convicted on felony drug charges for growing marijuana in her home, said he would appeal the decision, adding, "The ruling only applies to those who went to trial before July when the state medical board agreed that caregivers could simply provide marijuana. This ruling does not affect people that are in business right now. That being said, I represent a number of clients, and I will be advising people to meet their patients in person, in the abundance of caution."

A spokesperson for the Colorado Attorney General's office disputed Corry's interpretation, saying the Colorado Court of Appeals decision overrode the state medical board's action. A judge involved in the decision and advocates on both sides of the medical-marijuana issue called on lawmakers to clarify the role of caregivers under the Amendment 20 law.

"I am pleased to see the Court of Appeals has provided legal support for our case that a caregiver, under Amendment 20, must do more than simply provide marijuana to a patient," said Attorney General John Suthers. "I also was pleased to see the assertion ... that Amendment 20 'cries out for legislative action.' I could not agree more. I hope the legislature will act and create a regulatory framework that gives substance to the Court of Appeals' findings."

State Sen. Chris Romer said the state "needs to issue clear, bright lines and needs to define medical marijuana with a meaningful-caregiver relationship."

"If you are a dispensary simply selling marijuana and acting like a 7-Eleven, you will now be prosecuted based on this decision," Romer said. "My hope is that this will slow or stop the gold rush of dispensaries that are growing like weeds, no pun intended."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by maxwood on 02 Nov 09 07:31 PM EST
I think the crackdowners should ask themselves, with their eagerness to prosecute, are they really just protecting the tax cash cow $igarette industry against its cannabis nemesis? On the other hand Corry's advice is good, herbgivers should be caregivers, why pass up a chance to take the authorities at their word and develop a service network or extended family based on benefiting the client? This might produce good results which refute ignorant negatistic claims supporting the anti-cannabis "law enforcement" racket.

Posted by jrzshor on 04 Nov 09 12:36 PM EST
If MJ is to be considered a medicine, should it not be precribed by a real doctor and then be dispensed at the local CVS?

Posted by John Ray on 13 Nov 09 09:12 AM EST
The lack of science in the decisons about and in the use of medical marijuana concerns me greatly. People that grow the pot are "caregivers" and those who smoke it are the "patients"? I believe in some circumstances that is a vailid characterization. It appears that in many cases growers,dealers and addicts might be a more accurate representation."The patients have taken over the asylum and they have the key to the med room" might also be a valid characterization.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 17 Nov 09 04:55 PM EST
The lack of science in the decisons about and in the use of medical marijuana concerns me greatly, also! Study after study has shown the efficacy and safety of this herbal treatment, yet we continue to prohibit it on the national level. That is the height of self-serving callowness on the part of lawmakers and their enablers (Big Pharma, Tobacco and Alcohol Industy lobbyists).

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines