Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Marijuana Legalization Drive Fueled by Current Events
June 23, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Ongoing drug violence in Mexico and state budget deficits are driving optimism among supporters of marijuana legalization, the Associated Press reported June 16.

Legalization supporters argue that legalization will cut Mexican drug cartels out of the business and provide a new vehicle for generating state tax revenues.

"This is the first time I feel like the wind is at my back and not in my face," said long-time drug reformer Ethan Nadelmann of the Drug Policy Alliance.

While proponents are not expecting nationwide legalization, many are hopeful that statewide debate and changes are on the horizon.

"For the most part, what we've seen over the past 20 years has been incremental," said Norm Stamper, a former Seattle police chief now active with Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. "What we've seen in the past six months is an explosion of activity, fresh thinking, bold statements and penetrating questions."

"Obama's got two wars, an economic disaster. We have to realize they're not going to put this on the front burner right now," said Allen St. Pierre, executive director of NORML, or the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. "But every measurable metric out there is swinging our way."

Gil Kerlikowske, director of the federal Office of National Drug Control Policy, has not backed the concept of an all-options review of drug policy, but has recommended dropping the "war on drugs" label and focusing more on treatment and prevention.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 24 Jun 09 08:28 AM EDT
Thanks, JTO, for covering this article. One comment: We are all SO fortunate to have Ethan Nadelmann working for drug policy reform because, after all, he is the only one doing so. (Just ask him.) In case it's not obvious, that is sarcasm. We could use fewer self-congratulating, over-paid "mouth-pieces" and more common sense hard-workers for drug policy reform these days. Some of these groups do more harm than good -- witness the DPA's role in a very poorly conceived and administered medical marijuana program in New Mexico (which they hyped to collect $mucho dinero$ in contributions). If asked, I would recommend that people give their support to NORML, Americans for Safe Access, Patients Out of Time and Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. These groups are actually getting things done, and doing so with less "hey everybody, look at me!!" attitude. Dr. Nadelmann and DPA could learn much from those groups, if we could only get him to hide and watch a while.

Posted by me on 24 Jun 09 09:39 AM EDT
isn't it great that obama has put us in this mess of a financial situation and how everytime things like this happen, they always turn to legalizing drugs and then taxing the crap out of the pathetic drug users. what does a pack of cigarettes cost now $30? wise up people, don't play their game.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 24 Jun 09 10:28 AM EDT
The only person who could state here that Obama got us "... in this mess of a financial situation ..." is someone who can't seem to remember his own name. "Who, 'me'? Yes, 'me'". You know, 'me', some of us here were born at night, but it wasn't last night. There are other message boards for the willfully ignorant (try Faux News), but this isn't one of them.

Posted by Frank Winkler on 24 Jun 09 03:14 PM EDT
There is an excellent June 22, 2009, article by Steve Francis, "Debunking Call TO Legalize Marijuana," from the San Diego News Network. Francis is a local San Diego businessman, a former candidate for Mayor of San Diego, and former Nevada assemblyman, as well as a political columnist. Limited space here precludes repeating his article, in which he examines dubious polling techniques used to promote legalization, taxation of pot for revenue and other fallacious arguments used to promote legalization-- a problem he describes aptly as one "that doesn't exist." He concludes, "San Diego families are safer under a nation that is committed to fighting the social ills that exist today, rather than endorsing new ones that we can live without." Well worth a few minutes to read and digest.

Posted by Verde on 24 Jun 09 09:24 PM EDT
Legalizing Marijuana is not going to bail us out of the financial mess we are in. It is also not going to stop cartels from selling to the multitude of "patients and stoners." Cartels are already well established in our comunities and to stop the cartels would be to cut off a much needed supply to our poor defenseless cancer and HIV patients.

Posted by Carlos on 25 Jun 09 10:17 AM EDT
To legalize or not marijuana; is not the question? First part Since 1920 we have being debating among how to control the supply or the demand of drugs Making them legal or not is not the real solution. If we want to be part of that market or marketing strategic to win or lose votes, to affect or give power to a political party, that is nasty. If we are in the side to make a substance controlled, taxed, what is going on in your mind, business from our society weaknesses? Dam because you row, dam because you don’t? An alcohol is legal and kills almost 150,000 people a year directly or indirectly. Tobacco is a legal substance and it harms people around the globe. The real debate has to be how prevent, how to educate. I am inviting you to research about “How addiction happens?” There is a scale from one to one hundred on models trying to answer this question. It is cruel to say that it is a lack of will as cruel is to say that all dieses are in our mind only. We need to remember some natural laws, which we can not change at all. Our planet is alive, Live is a cycle, Now body is perfect and now body expect us to be perfect

Posted by maxwood on 25 Jun 09 06:12 PM EDT
"How addiction happens"? 1. In many places, including UK and EU, children are urged to "cut down the excess strength of the pot" by mixing it with guess what-- tobacco, in large hot-burning "joints" or spliffs. Then when they get hooked on those hot overdoses they routinely assume it is the cannabis they are hooked on, giving cannabis the bad name. This has been going on for decades, I was there in the 70's. 2. In the 1990's, in the USA, rap stars with significant names like "Tupac" and "Cool" were putting references to "blunts" in their songs, meaning you buy a baggy of good herb for $10, a cigar for $1, dump the tobacco filling and wrap the cannabis in the cigar wrapper leaf (which contains guess what-- nicotine!). (And then smoke away the whole investment in a few minutes like a big hero do.) Telling me Big 2Wackgo isn't behind the bad reputation that has been pinned on MJ?

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 25 Jun 09 07:49 PM EDT
Regulation is law and order. Prohibition is a free-for-all. It's taken 70 years, but folks are starting to wake up. It does help to have a vigorous discussion after so many decades of "Just Say No" stifled debate and scientific inquiry.

Posted by Verde on 26 Jun 09 03:50 PM EDT
Maxwood, oh that was the government's doing? You crack me up. Potheads will be potheads, they teach one another bad habits and then blame the government and call them liars. Tupac and Bob Marley are the heros of the pot world, they wouldn't try to get you addicted. They just want to get high with you. Live sober!

Posted by Doug H. on 28 Jun 09 10:31 PM EDT
Am I the only person who knows that if we legalize marijuana the drug cartels in mexico won't say "ok, well we're out of business I guess." They will still want to make money through drugs and if marijuana is legal they will just use another drug, and then our streets will be flooded with an even harder, more dangerous drug, most likely cocaine.

Posted by mfmcgins on 29 Jun 09 12:29 PM EDT
One of the fallacies of the prohibition argument with impacting the drug cartels' profit margin is quality. Medical marijuana legalization efforts commonly (and rightfully) set a limit on THC content. We don't allow any other medicine to be sold without any quality control and this should be no different. The Canadian laws had set this at 15%. As soon as someone said it wasn't strong enough a black market was established for higher THC content. The inconsistencies in the various states passing medical marijuana laws leaves the consumer at risk with no protection regarding expectations for product benefit and leaves the black market issue wide open to the street seller. The FDA isn't perfect but it presents considerable protection to the consumer. If marijuana has legitimate medicinal value it should be able to meet similar conditions for consumer protection.

Posted by Veterans for Medical Mj Access.org on 29 Jun 09 01:30 PM EDT
For those of you who oppose medical mj, I would like you to know that the director of my VA Medical Center has put it in writing to us, that registered legal veteran patients in Michigan can use it safely as a VA patient. And it is great for PTSD symptom relief.

Posted by Nealisa on 30 Jun 09 12:15 AM EDT
I'm glad to see that people with "level heads" are starting to discuss decriminalizing mj. As I said before, these old pot laws were created from fear and greed. Reading studies that are from orgs and folks with no agenda tell the whole truth. That is, mj is a wonderful crop, with many purposes and applications, been used for thousands of years and beneficial to very many people. Many people who denounce this shift are just ignorant. Really, if you had no experience with mj, why would you care?? Some care because they are afraid things could get worse. So, discussion is important. So much has been said, and believed. Let us talk about solutions and positive outcomes and not bring those outdated beliefs into the discussion.

Posted by Smokey on 10 Jul 09 05:18 AM EDT
If I were a grower and marketer of marijuana involved with a Mexican or other cartel, I would do exactly what Joe Kennedy did in 1933, I would become a legal provider and keep my money coming in doing exactly what I had been doing. Alcohol is taxed based on the percent of alcohol content and marijuana can be taxed in a similar manner. It is not legal for me to run a still and not pay the alcohol tax. It would not be legal to grow marijuana and not pay the tax on it. Many of the other drugs are already legal medical products. Decriminalization is the answer there. We need change and we need it now.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines