Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Marijuana Going Mainstream in Arts, Some Communities
September 9, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Drug references are blossoming in popular culture and marijuana use has become increasingly mainstream in urban areas like Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Times reported Aug. 30.

Even Cheech and Chong are making a comeback as marijuana references become more common in music, art galleries, movie theaters, and on TV. The trend coincides with the decriminalization of marijuana in some states and polls showing growing public support for easing penalties on marijuana users.

The trend represents a big departure from the 1980s and 1990s, when an admission of youthful marijuana use could get a politician in hot water. Today, even presidents readily admit such past 'indiscretions,' while entertainers feel free to acknowledge being current marijuana users despite the drug's illegal status.

"The people who are making movies and television shows, from the scriptwriters to the director and the producers -- a very large chunk of those are probably people who grew up not only much more comfortable with marijuana's presence in society, but probably as consumers themselves of it," said Robert Thompson, a professor of television and pop culture at the University of Syracuse's S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications. "As a result, it's almost switched with alcohol. Think back to Dean Martin and Foster Brooks -- their whole comedy act was the fact that they were in the bag -- that now is seen a lot less often. The stoner is the new drunk."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by BfromB1P on 10 Sep 09 10:33 AM EDT
I think its funny how Cannabis becoming "mainstream" is NEWS WORTHY!? Take a GOOD look round you; on TV, in magazines, billboards, movies, shows, commercials and even sporting events seem to tell us alcohol is SOCIALLY EXCEPTED...(don't drink and drive (walk to the bar))... Just try not to notice it, ITS EVERYWHERE.

Posted by Eric Wood on 10 Sep 09 11:17 AM EDT
It's time to take a stand against marijuana or face far-reaching and irreparable consequences. Even Join Together is getting in the act -- The security word for me to submit this comment is "STONER". Geesh!

Posted by Arnie on 10 Sep 09 12:16 PM EDT
If all our so-called idols and heroes operate stoned or don't see the problem, perhaps the problem is not the use, but the "why" of the use. I see it as a socio-cultural matter that no law will be able to influence to a significant degree. Might it be reasonable to look at what our society has devolved into and address the stresses associated with it. Just a thought.

Posted by Diane Kopperman on 10 Sep 09 12:58 PM EDT
The dangerous part of the minimalization of pot use is that we have yet to establish a safe level of use; that is, at what level are you still safe to drive a car, operate dangerous machinery, make critical decisions at work, take care of your kids, etc? Also, we know that smoking pot while consuming as little as a couple of beers increases your intoxication level from the equivalent of .03 to .15. Since we know that many, if not most, people drink beer when smoking pot, they are substantially more impaired than they realize. Police depts throughout the country are noting that most of their intoxicated drivers are not on alcohol, but pot. Furthermore, how long is a person intoxicated after smoking pot? Is it 3 hours, 10 hours, 24 hours? Pot is not consumed in a uniform unit of measure, nor is it of equal potency. Until we can address these issues, we should be very careful about wholesale legalization of pot use. Just because more people are using pot or are admitting to the fact that they used pot doesn't mean that smoking pot whenever you feel like it is safe for SOCIETY, although it might be relatively harmless if one remains at home after consuming it.

Posted by Mike on 10 Sep 09 03:04 PM EDT
I'm a proponent for legalization, and here's why. The nation's jails don't have room for the violent offenders, and even murderers are getting the minimum sentences. They're having charges dropped down to basically nothing because our prisons are full of marijuana users and dealers. Even sex offenders get lighter sentences in my state (Kentucky). Our prisons are actually letting out all kinds of people because of the overcrowding, and a convicted killer is looking at 8 (25 if we're lucky) years tops before he's paroled. We should legalize marijuana and let the dealers and users out of prison, end this fruitless war on weed, and focus on the really violent offenders like crack, meth, heroin, and scripts.

Posted by Been There on 10 Sep 09 04:29 PM EDT
Unfortunately, it's going to happen. Government will find a way to regulate and tax it- no matter how shoddy it’s done- and then its party-time for the potheads. Hopefully, we learned from the alcohol industry's marketing practices to get ahead of the game in terms of advertising, etc. Since, in my opinion, I believe it's inevitable; we need to look ahead and ready policy recommendations to be submitted in a moment’s notice. If we don’t get a handle on it now we’ll be playing “catch-up” as we have since prohibition was repealed.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 14 Sep 09 01:36 AM EDT
I cannot, for the life of me understand why some of us are so afraid to regulate cannabis. Prohibition merely pushes use underground and out of societal moderation. In fact, as far as "consequences" go, I would say that regulation of cannabis would result in a number of people switching from alcohol and/or tobacco to cannabis. This would immediately reduce the truly horrendous consequences we see from the use of the latter two drugs. The "driving while impaired" mantra is a red herring, in my book, as studies have shown that cannabis does not particularly impair driving (except when mixed with alcohol). Frankly, I think we should encourage those who want to alter their consciousness to switch from tobacco and alcohol to cannabis. Remember, use is not necessarily abuse.

Posted by Rufus B on 14 Sep 09 11:53 AM EDT
Brinna, I appreciate your concern for reducing the horrendous consequences of alcohol and tobacco. We’re on the same page there. But your assertion that legalizing marijuana would help do this flies straight in the face of data and common sense. Marijuana is already very easy to get. Here’s a case in point. A recent CASA study shows a 37 percent increase in teens who report that marijuana is already EASIER to buy than cigarettes and alcohol. So if what you say is true, wouldn’t there be corresponding decrease in alcohol and tobacco as teens “switched over” to pot which is, in fact, easier to get? Nothing of the sort has occurred. (Tobacco use has decreased but studies have shown that is due primarily to increases in the price of tobacco and the advent of smoke free ordinances). Alcohol use/abuse continues to be steady. The reality is that polydrug use/abuse is the norm. None of the pot smokers I grew up with - from the full fledged “heads” to occasional users - ever eschewed tobacco or alcohol because they felt that cannabis was a nobler way to alter consciousness, or because they felt that it was less dangerous

Posted by RIDL_Prez on 14 Sep 09 12:35 PM EDT
"The trend represents a big departure from the 1980s and 1990s" That's hilarious. Completely overlooking the fact the the 1980's and 1990's were a BIG departure from the 1960's and 1970's where drug use was not only pervasive, but you were considered uncool if you didn't use it. The prohibitionists attitudes of the 80's and 90's just pushed it underground. I really don't think there was ever a decrease or increase of drug usage. It's just that it became socially unacceptable to talk about it. Things are just cycling back. As for me, I no longer partake in cannabis and haven't for over 20 years. But I could care less whether anyone else does. That's their lives and they should be free to live them as they want. What do the folks here have against other people getting high?

Posted by twobits on 14 Sep 09 02:11 PM EDT
As a child I used to lie in bed and think of ways to destroy all the alcohol, marijuana and cigarettes in the world. Their use destroyed large parts of my childhood. I never used any of these substances... but they have impacted me greatly because of my families use. Especially of marijuana. You can put any spin on it you like ... none of it is good for you. What about living sober? Isn't that even and option people consider anymore?

Posted by Eric Wood on 16 Sep 09 10:31 AM EDT
Brinna, please check your sources. The incident rate of driving while impaired on marijuana is very similar to that of alcohol. According to the Prevention Research Institute, research has found that drivers who had at least 5 or more nanograms of THC per milliliter of blood had a 6.6 increased odds of causing a fatal crash. This level of risk for causing a fatal accident is slightly HIGHER than the level of risk for a driver with a .10 blood alcohol level. Also 94% of marijuana users fail a standard roadside sobriety test 90 minutes after smoking. Sixty percent still fail after 2.5 hours.

Posted by qkruse on 17 Sep 09 12:39 PM EDT
It it is long past time that America and other countries get off of its high horse (no pun intended). The war on drugs was a rotten metaphor, we have not won a war since WWII....People are going to do what they want to do and prohibition has not and will not do anything but create and exacerbate unintended consequences. If you don't like to get high....then don't....if you don't want your kids to get high then learn how to parent for drug resistant kids....Take the money wasted on interdiction, apprehension, prosecution,and incarceration and spend it on treatment on demand, and prevention. Grow up and smell the incense.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 20 Sep 09 11:41 AM EDT
Eric, here are some of my sources: ---- Marijuana And Actual Driving Performance Conducted on behalf of: U.S. Department of Transportation,National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (DOT HS 808 078), Final Report, November 1993 ---- Jones MH (1978) Driver Performance Measures for the Safe Performance Curriculum. Traffic Safety Center, Institute of Safety and Systems Management, University of South California, Los Angeles, CA (DOT HS 803 461). ---- Robbe HWJ (1994). Influence of Marijuana on Driving. PhD thesis, Institute for Human Psychopharmacology, University of Limburg, Maastricht. ---- Smiley AM (1986). Marijuana: On-road and driving simulator studies. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving: Abstracts and Reviews 2: 121-134. ---- I looked for the Prevention Research Inst study you referenced and could not find it. I am sure that it exists somewhere, its just that you must realize that PRI has an agenda which is to prove harm in this area, which tends to preempt true discovery.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 20 Sep 09 11:53 AM EDT
Rufus, we share the same goals, but I believe you misinterpreted what I said: 1. Legalization would allow for effective moderation of what is presently a completely unregulated market. 2. After regulations are in place, a concentration effort to encourage the switch from alcohol and tobacco to cannabis should be instituted. Cultural pressures are strong. We reduced tobacco use, not by jailing tobacco users but by eliminating tobacco advertisements on TV, creating no smoke zones, and education the public on its terrible consequences. I firmly believe that as a society, in terms of public health, we would be much better off if it were culturally preferable to use cannabis over alcohol and tobacco. The question is: how to get there.

Posted by Chris on 23 Sep 09 01:46 PM EDT
Excuse me Brinna? Is this a joke? How would it be culturally preferable to use cannabis? And what do you mean by "regulated market". As with tobacco and alcohol,there are also medical risks- carcinogens - with marijuana. Including the damage it does to the developing endocrine and hormonal system. The effort to discourage tobacco use was born from the multi million dollar civil suits against the tobacco manufactures because of the medical damages. We might not have jailed the tobacco executives/dealers but they certainly answered to the legal system. Google Otto Moulton. He backed up his battle against cannabis with testimony in Congress and the Senate with evidence.

Posted by Dwayne on 01 Oct 09 08:23 AM EDT
Otto Moulton , Give me a brake he's a moron Show me proof that someone has died or has gotten violent from marijuana alone.Because I can show you death and violence from tobacco and alcohol. there is No solid proof to keep marijuana illegal except greed of power and money

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines