Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Lawmakers in S.F. Want to Limit Tobacco-Sales Permits
November 24, 2009

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

San Francisco has required retailers to get a special permit to sell tobacco products since 2003, and now city officials want to use the process to limit the number of cigarette vendors, the San Francisco Examiner reported Nov. 18.

Currently there are 1,097 approved tobacco vendors in the city, but a proposal would cut that number by up to two thirds by limiting permits to 35 for each of the 11 supervisory districts in the city.

The proposal is backed by tobacco-control advocates, who decry the proliferation of tobacco sellers in low-income neighborhoods, and some lawmakers who say the plan would make it easier to monitor tobacco sellers and crack down on sales to minors.

Current permit-holders would not lose their right to sell tobacco, but the total number of permits would be reduced by attrition under the plan. However, business groups in the city oppose the plan. The president of San Francisco's Arab American Grocers Association said that about 30 percent of revenues in members' stores comes from tobacco sales and that the businesses would become worthless if owners cannot transfer their tobacco licenses.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bill Godshall on 25 Nov 09 01:14 PM EST
Just as many local governments regulate/restrict liquor the number of retailing/serving licenses (and some are totally dry), local and/or state governments can and should regulate/restrict tobacco retailer licenses/permits. While nationwide cigarette consumption has declined by 50% since 1982 (from 32 to 16 billion packs), the number of tobacco retailers has remained at about 500,000. There are just 550 liquor stores but about 25,000 cigarette retailers. The problem with the proposal in SF is that there are no financial incentives for retailers to give up their tobacco retail permits. The most effective and fairest way to reduce/regulate the number of cigarette retailers is to increase annual permit fees to $1,000 or $2,000 or more, which would result in 10%, 20% or more of cigarette retailers (primarily low volume retailers) to voluntarily choose to stop selling cigarettes.

Posted by Bill Godshall on 25 Nov 09 02:23 PM EST
My last comment intented to say that here in Pennsylvania, there are only 550 liquor stores in the entire state, but about 25,000 cigarette retailers.

Posted by maxwood on 25 Nov 09 09:28 PM EST
Whether or not the number of licensed retailers is reduced, I wish they would consider (a) requiring all legally marketed cigarettes to contain, right on the paper where it can be read as easily as the name brand, the exact net weight of tobacco (usually 700-mg.), and the store to exhibit advertising for, and to have on premises ready to sell, miniature screened utensils with a long drawtube, used for 25-mg. single servings which can, as needed, be torn off the tip of a conventional overdose (would take 28 to use of one cig.).

Posted by Rob H. on 28 Nov 09 04:16 PM EST
Is it just me, or is there some irony in the attitude of the San Francisco "leadership?" Limiting the number of tobacco retailers while allowing more marijuana shops to open. Oh, well, money talks...and I guess the drug cartels have even more political power than the tobacco companies.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments