Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Indoor-Smoking Ban Defeated in Indiana
April 30, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

An Indiana lawmaker's attempt to ban smoking in public places was derailed by opposition from both Republican committee members and anti-smoking lobbyists, the Gary, Ind.-based Post-Tribune reported April 23.

Indiana state Rep. Charlie Brown inserted language into a bill dealing with mental health issues that would have banned smoking in public places except casinos and other gaming establishments. In denying the late-session maneuver, Republican state Sen. Connie Lawson said the amendment never received a proper Senate hearing.

Brown earlier introduced legislation banning smoking in all indoor public places except restaurants, bars and casinos, and guided it through the House. But Indiana's anti-smoking activists opposed the bill because it exempted some establishments, and the Senate Commerce Committee held no hearing on the bill.

Anti-smoking advocates also spoke against Brown's latest attempt at legislation, saying that a majority of Indiana voters favored a total ban on smoking in public places.

"This is about the art of compromise," Brown said. "I'm concerned this won't get a serious hearing again for two years, because next year is an election year, and I'm afraid many of my colleagues won't want to take a stand on this in an election year." 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Pete on 30 Apr 09 04:25 PM EDT
Good grief! Nothing ever seems to go quite right for poor old Charlie Brown. (Sorry, I couldn't resist.)

Posted by Musician on 01 May 09 11:59 AM EDT
Good that none of the bordering Ohio are buying into the smoking ban. I'm sure they look at the mess Ohio is in and say..NO THANK YOU. It's not good for business. Period. Business owners maintaining choice for their clientele is the way it should be for ALL the 50 states.

Posted by Thomas Laprade on 01 May 09 01:31 PM EDT
The people who have a vested interest on this issue are the owners, workers and the customers who voted 98 percent against any no-smoking bylaw

Posted by virgilk on 01 May 09 03:21 PM EDT
Evidence for the dangers of not smoking comes from the 150th anniversary number of Atlantic magazine. P.J. O’Rourke points to (actual, serious) U.S. historical statistics showing that, in the period 1973-94, annual per capita consumption of cigarettes fell from 4,148 to 2,493. In the same period, the incidence of lung and bronchial cancer rose from 42.5 to 57.1 cases per 100,000 population. See article… http://www.proudtobecanadian.ca/index/writergroup/index/smoking_out_the_facts/

Posted by Rob H. on 01 May 09 05:30 PM EDT
Musician, name ONE state or municipality where a smoking ban resulted in a loss of business. Just one. Virgil, P.J. O'Rourke is a brilliant satirist. When people DIE, like they do when they get cancer, they don't smoke anymore. So the consumption of cigarettes goes DOWN, while the incidence of cancer goes UP...particularly among smokers who smoked for many years before 1973. I can tell that you got the joke, by the first line of your post. I just wanted to clarify it..so rabid pro-smoking zealots don't start misusing Mr. O'Rourke's statistic.

Posted by Ohio on 01 May 09 06:08 PM EDT
Rob, here is one for you..Ohio, its destroyed and smoke free Ohio aka acs/ala/aha funded by J&J's foundation (RWJF) lied with the no harm to business and shs kills. Its amazing, J&J profits from its own nicotine that is given to kids and pregnant women and now we find out it causes mouth cancer. Invistigate, investigate investigate, something stinks in Ohio and its not th esmokers

Posted by snowbird on 01 May 09 10:26 PM EDT
A no-smoking law means it will be against the law to use or permit a legal product on 'private' property. That NOT the American way

Posted by Musician on 02 May 09 12:43 AM EDT
Since someone already responded with facts to Rob, there is really no need for me to do the same.

Posted by virgilk on 02 May 09 07:55 PM EDT
Looks like I don't need to point one out. It was done for me. I could name dozens but with the ACS in your back pocket, why bother. You have no room to talk about rabid. How do you account for smoking dropping from 54% to 24% at the same time Cancer almost doubles along with every disease blamed on smoking.

Posted by smokefree on 14 Jun 09 08:29 PM EDT
secondhand smoke cost Indiana 1,194 hoosier lines and $390 million just in 2007 alone,and all this money came from our taxes.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines