Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

House Budget Draft Would Clear Way for D.C. Medical Marijuana Vote
July 7, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The financial services subcommittee of the U.S. House appropriations committee has removed a ban on the District of Columbia using federal or local funds to legalize marijuana or to reduce penalties for its possession or distribution, the Washington Examiner reported June 28.

Rep. Jose Serrano (D-N.Y.), the subcommittee chairman, said the budget bill "allows the District to conduct and implement a referendum on use of marijuana for medical purposes as has been done in various states."

In 1998, D.C. voters approved the use of medical marijuana, but the votes were declared invalid. However, when the ballots were unofficially tallied nearly a year later, it was found that 69 percent of voters supported legalization. Chuck Thies, who worked on the 1998 medical-marijuana campaign, predicted that the measure would pass again.

The D.C. budget bill also eliminates a ban on the use of local funds for abortion, as well as allowing the use of funds for domestic-partnership registration.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 08 Jul 09 08:45 AM EDT
Abraham Lincoln once said: "Prohibition goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control man's appetite by legislation and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded". He also said: "'Union and Liberty,' and onward to victory!" Good luck to the District of Columbia, and to another brick pulled from the wall of nonsense that is marijuana prohibition. Abraham Lincoln

Posted by The Great Stephen Dapper on 08 Jul 09 01:47 PM EDT
The district should lead by example, legalizing not merely medicinal marijuana but all recreational drugs. Drug Wars experience has taught prohibitions of recreational drugs serves only to drive up prices, and stimulate illegal activity, while imposing unacceptable costs in terms of high crime, expansion of prison populations, and deterioration of global relations. This DC budget bill should include regulatory structure similar to that for Tobacco applied to all currently illegal recreational drugs

Posted by Frank Winkler on 08 Jul 09 03:29 PM EDT
Let's legalize all forms of substance abuse. And while we're at it, let's also legalize hunting down and bagging addicts as trophies to hang on the wall. After all, if they're willing to kill themselves with drugs, and victimize the rest of society in the process to support their habits, it seems only reasonable to level the playing field for the rest of us by declaring open season on them, in turn. This could turn out to be quite the sport, to include separate seasons for bow and arrow, black powder, hand gun only, and so on. But Open Season would be year-round, all the same. What fun! And just think how much money hunting permits could generate for our strapped governments-- probably a great deal more than marijuana could ever produce! Legalization makes so much sense!

Posted by Verde on 08 Jul 09 06:08 PM EDT
Go potheads! Keep spreading the desease. We shall continue to deal with the worthless shells that most addicts become. But go ahead and continue to spew the freedom garbage. What about the responsibility that comes with freedom? What about the freedom to grow up in a drug free society for everyone else? It might be a dream, but it is a dream that most parents have for their children. In Abe's day, their was a multitude that rose against the government, which divided this country. So, once again the division has come. And we will decide the fate of this Nation and it's values as a whole, through war, discusion, tolerance and with law. Unfortunately we have criminals out there that only support the law when it suits them. Then they scream and shout when the law is violated. Like the thousands of potheads that violated the law by selling pot, smoking pot and all that while it was illegal. And now all of a sudden they want to act like they are law abiding citizens because they go out and fake some illness to obtain a medical marijuana card. It makes me sick. It would not surprise me to see this issue lead to the next civil war, we are about due for one anyway.

Posted by maxwood on 08 Jul 09 06:34 PM EDT
The last post threatening civil war verges on the rhetoric of famous and beloved "Michael Savage". Are you trying to get some politician assassinated? Throwing words like "pothead" around suggests you are obsessed with the "potshot" as political decision-making method. As for "the law" (or th'Al-lah) against cannabis, it is the best law 2Wackgo campaign contributions could buy. If 69% makes you sick, maybe you need a medical card. If herb gets legalized, maybe we'll name it Verdi after the hero who wrote "Falstaff" at age 80.

Posted by Comments Moderator, Join Together on 08 Jul 09 08:30 PM EDT
Two comments on this story were deleted for being off-topic and borderline inflammatory. Please follow the comments guidelines posted below in order to keep the discussion constructive for all.

Posted by Bernie Ellis on 09 Jul 09 09:45 AM EDT
Thanks to the comments moderator for removing offending comments. Just sorry I missed 'em before they were removed. (I can guess who they came from.) I hope that JTO will begin revoking posting privileges for people who consistenly defame others here and do so under cover of anonymity. This is an excellent discussion board and should not be diminished by illiterate trolls on any side of the substance abuse reduction arena. Thanks again.

Posted by Frank Winkler on 09 Jul 09 10:29 AM EDT
For the Moderator: You have an interesting interpretation of what consitiutes inflammatory. It's perfectly okay to promote legalization and use of all toxic substances, but censure comments critical of such proposals, even when tongue in cheek. Such an approach is neither balanced nor constructive. How unfortunate.

Posted by Comments Moderator, Join Together on 09 Jul 09 02:47 PM EDT
We don't censor comments because of their point of view, as even a cursory review of the breadth of comments posted on this site daily would reveal. Although what constitutes an inflammatory post is a judgment call, we do our best to apply that judgment without regard to ideology.

Posted by Frank Winkler on 09 Jul 09 11:41 PM EDT
Noted, but actions in this case speak far louder than words. Just another illiterate troll.

Posted by Verde on 10 Jul 09 02:40 AM EDT
Wow, I must have gotten a little off topic again. I know I didn't offend anyone. Sorry everyone. Ellis' comment is not on topic, it should be removed. Hopefully all the voters in DC get out to oppose this Marijuana adgenda.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 10 Jul 09 02:01 PM EDT
Excellent news! Finally, the US Govt is abandoning its practice of egregiously overriding the will of the people in Washington DC. This is sweet democracy in action, and I, for one, am thoroughly delighted.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines