Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Former Latin American Leaders Call for Legalization Debate
February 13, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The former presidents of Colombia, Brazil and Mexico declared the war on drugs a failure and called for a meaningful debate on alternatives, including more treatment for drug users and legalization, Reuters reported Feb. 11.

Drug prohibition has led to increased violence and crowded prisons but has failed to stem trafficking.

"The problem today in the U.S. is that narco-trafficking is a crime and so any politician is fearful of talking about narco-trafficking or talking about policies because they will be called soft," said former Colombian President Cesar Gaviria, who joined with former Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso and former Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo under the umbrella of the Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy to call for a serious, international discussion on alternative anti-drug policies.

The United Nations is poised to hold meetings to draft a new drug policy for the next decade. The presidents' group called for a focus on treating users, decriminalizing marijuana, and investing in drug education.

"It will be almost impossible to solve Mexico's problems and other countries' problems without a more ample, comprehensive set of policies from the U.S. government," Cardoso said. 

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Gary Hall on 13 Mar 09 12:08 PM EDT
Like many males assembling a new appliance, "after all else fails, read the directions." Sadly this seems to be the case where billions of dollars have poured in to interdiction and enforcement yet few for prevention. If substance abuse prevention had been funded in significant ways, perhaps these leaders would have not come to this sad conclusion. I believe interdiction, and treatment are vital to support but if governmental leaders changed the funding ratios around, they may find that demand reduction is pennies on the dollar much more effective.

Posted by Jim Robinson on 18 Mar 09 08:49 AM EDT
I support increased funding of treatment and prevention strategies, however strong interdiction and enforcement, not legalization, are also vital to combatting this scourage on society.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines