Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Forbes Names 'Drug Capitals of America'
January 23, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Big cities like New Orleans and Baltimore and small communities like Espanola, N.M., have been named on Forbes magazine's list of 'Drug Capitals of America.'

Forbes reported Jan. 21 that the list is based on geographic drug-use data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and other federal sources.

Espanola, for example, has a high rate of heroin use and a drug-related death rate of 42.4 per 100,000 population, compared to a national average of 7.3 deaths per 100,000. Missoula, Mont., had the nation's highest rate of illicit drug use -- 13.8 percent of households reported monthly use of drugs, including high rates of methamphetamine use -- according to SAMHSA.

Cocaine and crack remain the biggest illicit-drug problems in Washington, D.C., but in nearby Baltimore heroin use remains stubbornly prevalent.

Nationally, about 8 percent of Americans report using illicit drugs, but the rate is much higher in some communities. "There are different drug-use rates among the population," said John Carnevale, a public-policy consultant and former Office of National Drug Control Policy staffer. "Some communities do get impacted more -- sometimes because of location; it could be local economies; it could be all kind of things. I wish we really knew the answer, and maybe we could have a more effective strategy."

Experts said that drug prevention would be more effective if regional variations in use were better understood.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Bruce R. Talbot on 26 Jan 09 10:23 AM EST
Current data on the local level is an important aid in program targeting. Some communities are spending large percentages on anti-meth programs when other abuse such as prescription drugs are a bigger problem in the community. Old data or data that is national rather than local can cause us to misallocate drug prevention/response funding.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 26 Jan 09 12:12 PM EST
The City of Baltimore and the State of New Mexico have been using Harm Reduction Model. Just more proof that Harm Reduction does not work when it come to illegal drugs.

Posted by from NM on 26 Jan 09 04:16 PM EST
New Mexico provides prevention and treatment programs as well, especially in the area of Espanola. Pointing a finger of blame at one source is very misleading. This area is poverty-stricken, and what we find is that is a primary contributing factor to all drug use.

Posted by Thomas Kelly on 27 Jan 09 03:04 PM EST
The issue is also finding funding to provide alternative activity and prevention programs. Too many times funding is tied to the "drug of the month"; wherein we monies if we make sure we do prevention programs for that drug or activity. Smaller communities may miss out because they have no grant writing professionals for additional funding to meet their individual community needs.

Posted by C.J. in Oklahoma on 02 Feb 09 04:10 PM EST
I agree with Mr. Talbot. I know here in Oklahoma we just spent a boot-load of money on a big TV program on Meth when our kids are falling under the influence of alcohol and prescription drugs, not meth. And if you ask a meth addict what drug they used first, they they'll usually say, "tobacco" or "alcohol."

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines